this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
-19 points (47.4% liked)

Technology

60105 readers
1856 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] coffinwood@feddit.de 288 points 1 year ago (13 children)

No they don't. What a rubbish clickbait article.

All they say is that there's a (niche) trend of a few people using feature phones with expected combined sales of $2.8 million. Versus the $200 billions of iPhones alone.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They weren't entirely wrong. The numbers don't lie. They just don't say what the author claims it does.

[–] coffinwood@feddit.de 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's directly in the headline: Gen Z is ditching the iPhone. That's incorrect in two ways: A) it's at best one in fifty people buying aforementioned feature phones and B) they don't even know if all buyers replace their existing phone or buy it as an additional handset.

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I have both a smartphone and a flip phone.

I kept both because the flip phone lets me make phone calls from my basement and many other places that the smartphone cannot.

I have never met anyone else with this setup.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the flip phone lets me make phone calls from my basement and many other places that the smartphone cannot.

Why? The smartphone supports everything the flip phone does. Honest question.

[–] raef@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I guess the radio is a bit more efficient

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doubt.

Haven't seen a flip phone in use in ages and I work among the public. Even the barely functional elderly on smartphones.

Who paid for this article? What's their angle?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Just the other day I saw an article with the exact opposite headline about how Gen z is sticking with the iPhone. Now I don't know which one is full of shit; but it's obviously one of them.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago

It was about how Gen Z are rejecting "droids" in favor of iPhones

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Playing_both_sides.jpg

[–] bug@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Isn't the angle just to sound interesting/controversial/unbelievable so people click and see your ads? You know, clickbait?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

For the past 10 years I never bought a phone for more than 300 euros.

I usually get a new phone every 3 years to have the latest tech and donate or recycle the old one.

For the last year I had an iPhone 13 pro (usually goes around 1100 euro) as a work phone and my personal Redmi Note 11 Pro I bought for 270 euros and not once I told myself: Man, this iphone is at least 3 times better than my Xiaomi. It's clearly a premium product but a middle category budget phone can match most features and even more. I still have a headphone jack, bigger 120 Hz screen, IR blaster and an amazing fingerprint sensor.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

iphone is clever marketing scheme to become a status symbol for a generation that no longer has a car as one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ya, this pretty much me. I had a bad experience with the budget pixel. Wouldn't recommend them.... But otherwise haven't really missed out on having a top end flagship phone at all.

[–] genoxidedev1@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup, I'm on the Redmi train as well, got a Redmi Note 10, will probably upgrade next month or this month depending on how much money I have left after all expenses. Had it for 2 years or something and it has a crack throughout a good length of the screen otherwise I'd keep it even longer. Cost me 200 € new.

May just get the same phone you got or a newer one/alternative if I find one until then. -> Probably the Note 12 (Pro, if the features are worth it), looking at GSMArena right now. Rooting it again will be annoying though

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Magister@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I though genZ only bought iPhone because of the green bubble or something?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] skymtf@pricefield.org 30 points 1 year ago

I don't trust these numbers, I really don't trust any article that talks about my generation.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This same BS headline happens every generation. As soon as any small trends form, the media latch onto it like it's gonna be the next big thing...

No, feature phones aren't gaining mass adoption again. No, feature phones aren't going to kill smartphones. It's just a subset of people deciding to downgrade, or who want to buy a secondary phone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a thing that isn't happening, at least not among Gen Z. What a bullshit article.

[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a millennial, the thought of ditching my smartphone is a thought that keeps coming up.

[–] betternotbigger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did it for 3 months. I really enjoyed my time doing it and learned a lot about my usage. It was a cheap $50 experiment. After I went back to my smartphone, I uninstalled ALL social media apps. Turned off ALL notifications but left calls and messages as an exception. My smartphone is now essentially a feature phone. It's not 100% the same since the big screen does lure you in to use it but my usage is still way down and because I don't have any social media there's no reason for me to be on my phone around other people. I wholeheartedly recommend trying it for those curious.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That reminded me how a local wanna-be influencer did a smartphone detox for a week, immediately after the completion she posted an FB story: Part 1 - Reflection, how eyeopening the experience was, how much time she suddenly had for the things that truly matter etc. Subscribe to not miss the Part 2!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I was not disabled with way too much time to burn, and where the weight of a phone is ideal, I would go back to a dumb flip phone like this. Smart phones are an addiction that, at best, must be consciously managed. Heck, I'm beside my workstation procrastinating right now.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It's after 1AM and I'm meant to be sleeping...what the heck am I doing? I'll put the phone down now, just after I post this comment and maybe just refresh my front page one more time.

[–] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

As if we needed another sign that ZDnet was trash…

I fucking hate these obviously bullshit articles. “Gen Z is using feature phones”, “Gen Z are using paper maps”, “Gen Z is doing XYZ”.

No, they aren’t. At best some sad excuse for a journalist found a handful of tweets and wrote a whole article on it like it’s a “trend”.

Look, I know “journalists” are being squeezed to produce at an unreasonable rate but if you write drivel like this then you have no business calling yourself a journalist, hell I don’t even think you can call yourself a “writer” or “contributor” either. It barely passes as writing and you are contributing nothing to society.

[–] regalia@literature.cafe 15 points 1 year ago

These articles of "Gen Z is doing X" is always wrong lol.

[–] PierreKanazawa@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If only that's allowed as a choice.

So many places assume you have a smartphone, and so many stuffs require one

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This I wish, but I doubt. I still have my old Garmin GPS and play with the idea of a flip phone but I’ve been spoiled by the smaller things like iMessage not dealing with MMS. It’s an idea I come back to occasionally, but I also think about going back to my Palm with AAA batteries for my PIM needs. Had one in semi-regular-use as recent as 2018!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Havent seen "$100 feature phone" since 2017 when my grandpa upgraded his phone
- gen z

[–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago
[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

The games are better for one.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm so tempted to do this.

[–] betternotbigger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did it for a few months and really enjoyed it. At the end of 3 months, I realized I could achieve nearly the same thing by turning off all notifications except messages and calls and uninstalling all social media. I realized... if I have the willpower to use a dumbphone I have the willpower to keep the distraction off my smartphone. Phone usage is now 100% intentional with the right setup.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They all realized a $100 phone does the same shit as a $1500 phone... There is nothing they add to the expensive phones that justify the price

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

A $200 smartphone does the same, but the article is about feature phones.

[–] VM_Abrantes@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Hell, with all of the features that are being removed these days, there's no justification for the price.

Now that LG is out of the market, I had to get a Nokia smartphone just to get an external microSD card slot and aux port.

$1000+ phone with capped internal memory for the purpose of pushing subscription cloud storage? Or a $300 phone with expandable physical storage?

load more comments (2 replies)

Get this removeded clickbait garbage off my feed OP

[–] binboupan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personally I switched to a Qin F22 Pro to curb my smartphone addiction. Only have the essential apps installed on it. So far it has worked out well (I used to have a screen time of over 6 hours every day, now just minutes). Life feels so much more peaceful without all the notification spam I used to get, and my mind is definitely more clear now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

and the numbers don't lie.

Righto Scott Steiner.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve considered doing this in combination with a Pine phone or other impractical but cool linux phone so that I don’t have to worry about not having at least reliable SMS and calling.

Anyone know if there is a tiny dumb phone out there that doubles as a 4G/5G hotspot?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I heard cassettes are making a comeback too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›