this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
211 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The two staffers, according to a source with knowledge of the incident, are deputy campaign manager Justin Caporale and Michel Picard, a member of Trump’s advance team.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 80 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I really wish the Arlington employee would press charges. I understand why they won't, but it's really disturbing that the campaign and the candidate are lying about what happened.

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish Arlington would press charges and somehow leave the employee anonymous. I'm sure there's an argument to be made that it, as the employer, has standing.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Regardless of the altercation with the employee, is there no enforcement in that Section 60 rule which prohibits political campaigning? Why even have that if it's not enforced? Seems like this is just enabling a rabid base to be the attack dogs for an unhinged person running for president.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

You expect the federal judiciary to take action against Trump?

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Does the employee really have to press charges? A federal law was broken and there is ample evidence. Many, if not most laws don't require the victim to press charges.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Prosecutors are generally somewhat accommodating of victim/witness preferences, because being subpoenaed to testify in open court can be intimidating in even low profile cases. And forcing a person to testify against their will generally isn't a good trial strategy for winning cases.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The penalty for filming in Arlington is a fine and up to 6 months in jail. Jail time is very unlikely, and there's no indication of what the fine would/should be, but the bad press would be worse than any financial penalty.

Assault is a more serious crime, but the victim would need to cooperate with the prosecution. I don't know if "press charges" is the correct term, but the victim is afraid of retaliation, so I doubt any of it goes anywhere.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

She dropped everything likely because of threats. Look at how they treat witnesses, judges, jurors, and all the families.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 2 months ago

"Joe Biden owes the men and women that served in Afghanistan a debt of gratitude and an apology. Donald Trump loves this country and will never forget the sacrifice and bravery of our service members," she added. "Join us in putting him back in the White House."

The pathetic willful ignorance for his love of nothing but himself is old and boring. These people are pathetic.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Trump said Harris made it up and the media doesn't push back on him for saying something blatantly false. This started with the personnel involved reporting it. Harris only commented on the incident well after the fact.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I read the first two words as "Trumpy dumpty". I'm a little disappointed now.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

If his movement fails, reach out to me and we’ll collaborate on a parody of the whole poem.