Christ, it's not even close. Next they'll sue them for selling apples.
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
43 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
59204 readers
4036 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wow, not close at all. If Apple wins this that means pretty much no one can use any kind of apple for their logo. That's not fair.
it's like they replaced their lawyers with a ML model, the AI said "iconography of an apple" and it crapped out a lawsuit.
*Century old
Apple is a bunch of arseholes. Won't see a sent from you pricks.
I view apple not as badly as Nestle but definity getting up there
Sadly this is more a symptom of how trademark law works. There's a "use it or lose it" aspect that compels brands to fiercely, overzealously defend their logo against any that look even remotely similar, or they risk losing their hold over it.
Brands don't do it for their own satisfaction; really the bad press it can generate is often enough to see any case dropped — but what matters is that they show an effort to 'defend' their trademark.
Trademarks are for a specific line of trade, though, as the name implies. Apple isn't in the fruit or food business at all as far as I know. Not sure whether this is different in the EU (or Switzerland, which I guess isn't part of the EU).
Their application doesn't list any businesses related to agriculture.
How hard would it be for the farmer to fight this?
If anything, the farmer should be suing Apple.