this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13006 readers
8 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was a surprising area to see novel approaches being tried, though it doesn't seem to remotely solve the problems around cocoa beans.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

[…] scientists in Switzerland have come up with a way to make chocolate using the entire cocoa fruit rather than just the beans - and without using sugar.

I think they still are using sugar, but they’re getting it from the same plant instead. Nevertheless, it’s fascinating work.

The cost may remain something of a challenge, because of the global power of the sugar industry, and the generous subsidies it receives. "The cheapest ingredient in food will always be sugar as long as we subsidise it," explains Kim Mishra. "For a tonne of sugar, you pay $US500 [£394] or less." Cocoa pulp and juice cost more, so the new chocolate would, for now, be more expensive.

Ah! So perhaps it was not seen as economically viable.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TIL... I can get a literal ton of sugar for the cost of a month's groceries.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 4 points 2 months ago

Not economically viable until the regular sugar is not longer subsidized.

If the cocoa was subsidized then it probably would be, lol

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This sounds like a solution in search of a problem.

Sugar from cane or beets is already cheap, are cocoa husks really such a big problem we can't just compost them?

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What I take it as it will reduce labor costs since you're chucking the whole thing into production instead of just the beans.

But then again, slavery is very inexpensive sooooooooo.....

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If cocoa pulp costs more than finished sugar, how is adding more work going to reduce labor costs?

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

I would imagine it would all be ground together (picked, cut, seeds scooped out, fermented vs. picked, smashed in machine, fermented).

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

Is this going to be like hfcs?