The Interfaith Esperanto Committee strongly objected, or at least that's what it sounded like, but nobody else speaks Esperanto so they might have just been upset that lunch was late.
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
108 points (97.4% liked)
Malicious Compliance
19585 readers
2 users here now
People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.
======
-
We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
-
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
-
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.
======
Also check out the following communities:
!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Kial ne ambaŭ?
Saluton, kiel vi fartas?
Hmm, so "kialo" means something in Esperanto?
Yes, kialo is the reason for something to be. The cause, generally.
It's the best language for debating religion, there is no question :)
It would have been inclusive to allow for Arabian, Greek, Latin and Hebrew. And it would have been epic to see an Arabic response to a Greek post citing a Latin quote.
I thought about Hebrew actually, Latin is more law and medicine
Certe, frater meus in Christo.
Spez flagitium hominis est
Lol I think this is my favorite sub protest yet
People keep coming up with smarter and smarter way to protest, I love it!
Bah. Just another Christianity-centric policy. What about the Zoroastrians?
Ok, for me this is the best protest I see in recent days
permitterent etiam hebraicum, sanscritum, arabicum, prakrit vel sereas classicas.