UK Politics

3097 readers

164 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

John Mason stripped of SNP party whip over 'unacceptable' Gaza posts - BBC News (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 3 months ago by mannycalavera to c/uk_politics

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Wimopy 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Would've been nice if they added the little tidbit in the headline that said Gaza posts were specifically denying what is happening in Gaza is genocide.

John Mason stripped of SNP party whip after 'unacceptable' posts claiming events in Gaza 'not genocide'

Maybe remove the unacceptable quote if that's too long. And suddenly some might not go in with the idea that maybe it was because he made a pro-Palestine post.

I mean if you know John Mason you probably wouldn't assume that, but I think it's healthier for journalists to presume you don't know all the MPs and MSPs.

*: edited to add that the info should've been added in the headline

[–] mannycalavera 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They showed his tweets further down in the article. The bit about: "If Israel wanted to kill them they could do" was especially disgusting.

[–] Wimopy 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah oops, I meant to say "in the headline". I agree, his tweets were disgusting and I think they should've been highlighted more from the get-go. I just dislike that the headline as it is makes it seem as if the SNP possibly overreacted or reacted in a pro-Israel way. Feels like it's misleading by omission.

[–] mannycalavera 4 points 3 months ago

Ahh gotcha. Yeah I was actually thinking the same. I thought how bad could it be? Oh. Bad. Shit.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

labour could learn a thing or two from snp.

[–] echodot 1 points 3 months ago

I assume they already know how to lose in Scotland.