this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
137 points (97.9% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15923 readers
2 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RION@hexbear.net 88 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Dimwit: spies are good when they're the good guys (Americans)

Midwit: espionage is a complex phenomenon, and its practicioners must be evaluated accordingly with consideration for the geopolitical landscape of their time

Ascended intellect: spies are good when they're the good guys (Communists)

[–] miz@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

liberals don't believe in anything, so they can't comprehend that it might matter what you believe

[–] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 4 months ago

Spies are good when they're able to utilize their gear, uncloak in the right time and take out high value targets like enemy medics and engineers.

[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 72 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Rosenbergs were actual Soviet spies

Care-Comrade

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 59 points 4 months ago

Yeah I didn't get it at first but then I realized the community note is meant to be a bad thing lol

waow-based

[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 56 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The US wanted to nuke every little country that defied them. I wish the US’ fears of judeo bolshevism at the highest levels of government were real because it deserved a whole lot worse than atom bomb secrets being passed to the only countries willing/able to hold the US accountable.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 4 months ago

Imagine what would happen do countries like Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and many more since if US was the only country with nukes. They would drop them all the time even if just because they are cheaper than conventional bombings.

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 4 months ago

Black people were invented in 1926 by Jossepi Stalin to make America look bad.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For those of us who need a history lesson here, what's the real story?

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 68 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The community notes are real. The Rosenbergs were fucking heros.

One of the ironies of the Soviet Union was that they had a extraordinary amount of sympathizers in the U.S. government, even well into the 90's. It is arguably this level of 'understanding' that lead to the dissolution of the USSR, as the high level functionaries in the KGB (including golden boy of the West, Putin) thought that they would be able to dissolve the Soviet Union, then peacefully integrate into the world economy.

[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Supposedly there were actual communists within the CIA that fed information to the USSR. Don’t recall specific names, though.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Aldrich Ames in CIA and Robert Hanssen in FBI, though they worked much later and neither was a communist (Hanssen might be or at least antiimperialist, but he never admitted that). Hanssen pissed the pigs so much they given him 15 life sentences.

In the Manhattan project, beside Rosenbergs there were at least three other Soviet spies:

  • Georg Koval, an engineer working for GRU, most likely real communist, USA do not know till today what exactly he gave to GRU and the fact he was a spy was only really revealed in 2007 when Putin gave him the Hero of Russian Federation for that.
  • Harry Gold, courier, he was a communist but apparently very shallow one. Recruited by NKVD he was only a minor asset. Didn't worked in MP directly, but was courier for Fuchs.
  • Klaus Fuchs, physicist, one of the main theoretical fathers of both nuclear and hydrogen bombs, passed tons of info about US, UK and Canadian nuclear projects to Soviets over the 9 years. He was at first member of SPD, from which he was kicked out for associating with Thalmann, then he joined KPD. Later in life he lived in GDR and was a member of cnetral comitee of SED, so definitely real deal communist.

All that said, it is actually still unknown and most likely exaggerated how much all those agents improved the Soviet nuclear project, most likely the data they provided served mostly to compare with western projects because Soviet nuclear project had no real problems with theory or engineering, they were mostly restricted by the amount of enriched uranium and plutonium they could produce because in the first piles it went really slow, and USA had significant time advantage in that.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

Even the wiki on the Rosenbergs backs up the idea that the spying likely didn't accelerate development that much of at all

Lavrentiy Beria, the head official of the Soviet nuclear project, used foreign intelligence only as a third-party check rather than giving it directly to the design teams, who he did not clear to know about the espionage efforts, and the development was indigenous. Considering that the pace of the Soviet program was set primarily by the amount of uranium that it could procure, it is difficult for scholars to judge accurately how much time was saved, if any.

Like basically everywhere else, the major limiting factor was access to uranium. Not technical knowledge.

[–] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

here's the quick unsourced version: the US was developing the atom bomb, and planned (sometimes for real, others as disinfo) to build enough of them to carpet-nuke (this was before long range missiles and rockets) the entire Soviet Union, a plan that if completed would have been (one of?) the greatest genocide(s) in world history. several US atomic scientists, sought out contact with the USSR (independently, many unaware of the others) so that they could give them the information necessary to prevent this planned nuclear holocaust before America could build enough bombs.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I know you said unsourced, but, carpet bomb the entirety of the Soviet Union? I mean, extrapolating from the bombings of Japan I can definitely see this potential reality. Is this something that was on the books, or just the logical conclusion of the US having nukes and no one else coming close?

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 27 points 4 months ago

i thought it was mostly just the understanding that the only thing that would restrain the US would be a rival with parity. the only 'carpet bomb with nukes' i've heard about was Macarthur's idea for 'winning' Korea by bombing the north of China

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

When America was.the only country with an atom bomb, they made some scary fucking plans. The cold war was by far the better option than America as the sole nuclear superpower. They were totally down to use em cause no one could retaliate at a similar scale.

[–] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

well there is this plan which was apparently intentional disinformation (idk enough to say whether the 'intentional disinformation' angle is american copium or not, i read somewhere on one of these articles that 'truman was shocked at the lack of nuclear arms stocks' for some of these plans):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Totality

there is also Operation Dropshot which was considered and then abandoned:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dropshot

another article about Dropshot, that also mentions Churchill's Operation Unthinkable:

https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/from-1945-49-the-us-and-uk-planned-to-bomb-russia-into-the-stone-age

also check out this page, especially War Plan Broiler:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_plans_(1945%E2%80%931950)

[–] TechnoUnionTypeBeat@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

From Plan Totality:

However, this plan was actually a disinformation ploy. After the two atomic bombings of Japan during August of 1945, the United States government did not have any nuclear weapons ready for use.

The disinformation part is what, that they didn't have enough nukes to genocide the Soviets, or that they weren't actually going to do it? Because this all implies they were going to if only they had nukes

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 4 months ago

Soviets still got nuclear power plant years ahead of USA. Burger brains think only about killing and weapons and they can't even actually invent them as proven by the massive amount of braindrained scientists in about every crucial weapon program.

[–] Red_sun_in_the_sky@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I love that they added the note about spies. As if I need to give a shit about america being spied on. America deserves it. Cry about it burger mfs.

Those are some brave spies. 🫡

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Had the US been the sole nuclear-armed state, potentially millions, if not billions of lives, may have been slaughtered. The Rosenbergs were heroes, and the US murdered them for preventing the US's genocidal tendencies from going nuclear. The Cold War was tense, but far better than a US dominated Hot War.

Death to America.