this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1578 points (98.8% liked)

Comic Strips

12538 readers
3622 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 152 points 3 months ago (7 children)

this is the exact reason why exile, excommunication, shunning, disfellowshipping, and all the rest are so effective. and a big reason people go along with glaringly wrong bullshit

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 66 points 3 months ago (4 children)

And the internet has given the folks with wrongness in their heart an out to find communities who will act as a bulwark against internal progress. No one around you likes you because you're an asshole? Go on 8chan and get validated

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems so obvious from the outside looking into these online echo chambers, that you wonder how anyone participating can't see it.

The really hard part is identifying these sort of things in your own online spaces.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Comment sections were a mistake

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't fully agree with this sentiment. There have been plenty of times where comment sections have pointed out additional context/bad and/or missing information on articles that I wouldn't have otherwise known about. But on the other hand, they also can lead to cultivating echo chambers, as already mentioned. I think the best way to combat this is to teach people how to better recognize internal biases/prejudices and circle jerking, AKA some form of critical thinking.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago

Oh for sure. I'm over simplifying for shock value. The real problem is our brains haven't adjusted to being able to access communities further away than what's on the other side of the nearest hill

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand, it can achieve the exact same thing for people who belong to an irl community that insists on being wrong, allowing them to find better information and a group to validate it. That's certainly the vision people had of the internet back in the 90s. Too bad it hasn't been anywhere near as ubiquitously a force of fact-checking as they envisioned back then, but I'd be willing to bet it's been a stronger positive force than negative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The funny thing is that those spaces are themselves very heavy on enforcing dogma through fear of social rejection. For example when the Christchurch massacre happened, I decided to go see what /pol/ was saying, and there were actually a few comments expressing mild disapproval, in a "I hate muslims too but cheering at people being brutally murdered as they try to get away is too far" kind of way. These people were of course shouted down and insulted and their sympathy painted as weakness. That validation is conditional.

The less leeway people are given by their community to explore and express their genuine thoughts and feelings, the more inaccurate and fucked up the popular consensus is free to get.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fascists know exactly what they're doing. They study this shit. The study the environmental and mental conditions that led to the original fascist movement and they actively want that. The part I don't get, the thing that scares the shit out of me, is why. They got scooped out, emptied out, by our culture of emptiness and are refilling themselves with violence and they view this as good. Instead of building community through love, they build it through hate. Best I can figure out is that its easier to hate than to love.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My thoughts on this are, humans are pattern propagation machines. If someone is infused with spite and misery to begin with, love which fails to acknowledge and process that spite comes off as hollow and meaningless. Seeing others express the same things you feel is cathartic and generates trust. There is a profound need for sharing in feelings like contempt, rage, and the desire to hurt others that isn't fulfilled, and that gets exploited by people crafting those feelings to fit into their ideological narratives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's interesting that being completely shunned and outside of community though makes you either immune to the group think and therefore able to recognize and see the glaring oppositions of reality or lets you completely fall into madness with no recourse to pull yourself out of it.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

we're not as evolved as we like to think we are. ultimately we're driven by the primate brain's relentless urge to be part of a group (ANY group, apparently), on top of the more primal survival/mating dance instincts

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 59 points 3 months ago

This is what held me back for a long time, and I have to say, the fear is well founded. It has definitely driven a wedge between me and my community. The breakthrough is realizing that's okay.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 50 points 3 months ago (10 children)

This describes Christianity (to an extent). When I turned atheist (because I couldn't believe in God/Jesus anymore, not because I didn't want to) there is this very Church-shaped hole in your proverbial soul that needs time to close. It's a very sobering, yet lonely, way to live life, but due to the internet you don't find yourself lonely for too long, but I imagine it used to be a pretty terrifying way to live life pre-internet.

I am lucky my Christian family still loves me, and I know they only proselytize to me (every now and then) because they care.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

This is something that is extremely difficult to process. Most religions that have persisted assuage some of our most natural existential worries (e.g. mortality, right vs wrong, free will, isolation vs being watched over).

When someone stops believing, all of those questions float back to the surface, and "we really don't know" is such an unsatisfying answer.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Yeah I grew up before the internet was really big enough to find people in my situation so I just had to suffer in silence because I live in a very religious area.

It created a lot of resentment that I've had to struggle through because I was basically ostracized whenever my lack of faith was brought up. Some of the kindest sweetest people I'd ever met suddenly would act as if my existence was a disgrace.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 3 months ago (19 children)

I had to institute a no-politics rule with certain family members during the pan. It's saved relationships.

I have zero friends who are intolerant or hateful or shitty to others. If I found out someone I hadn't spoken to in a long time had become like the right wing nuts in my family I'd first try to talk to them about why that happened with hope of saving them, but if not: get out of my life.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Here's the thing: you're right to feel that way depending on your surroundings. I work in construction in Texas (and kinda look the part) and it is astonishing how many people are willing to buy into bullshit, and expect you to do the same, because that's what everyone else does. Finding another family that isn't gargling right wing propaganda, "god-fearing", or just one brand of asshole is so difficult around here.

Since our children were born we have been increasingly intolerant of all that nonsense. This has unfortunately led to our support system dwindling away because we aren't willing to compromise on the morale standards we want our kids exposed to.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Me - be white and wear my veteran's hat for no reason other than it's one of the few out there that's actually comfortable to wear.

Random conservatives - racism mode go!

I usually make one attempt to highlight their stuff, see if they're self aware at all, and then excuse myself from the conversation. Otherwise they always, and I mean every time, accuse me of stolen valor when they figure out I'm not a conservative.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah apparently being white and having a beard with a hint of unfortunate RBF is enough to signal racist around here. The toughest part is when it's coming from your professional superiors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This was my impression visiting Texas a few months ago (went for the eclipse and visited Houston, Austin, and Dallas).

Especially in Houston, it seemed that the propaganda was everywhere. Never mind being a city that could very much use some light-rail and instead is just a massive web of super wide highways (that still get congested). Seeing a Billboard announcing the Epoch Times as "the number 1 most trusted news", a half a mile before a Joel Osteen megachurch, really made me realize how much these ideas spreading so much are a product of their environment.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Man, it makes me sad that there are people who feel this way. My friends and family all support research and facts and are willing to accept any that challenges their preconceptions. To anyone stuck with friends and family that doesn't support them or is willing to accept reality, my heart goes out to you.

[–] LovableBastard@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 months ago

I think the hard part is, almost no one realizes that they felt that way until they are finally on the outside.

I remember a really interesting article I read a few years ago that indicated the best way to change someone’s viewpoint was to welcome them into your community or group without requiring a change of mind first.

Turns out our social and emotional needs will trump our rational or logical side almost every time.

So you’re 100% right. What people need is a caring group of family and friends who encourage each other to question themselves in an effort to learn and grow.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

My friends and family all support research and facts and are willing to accept any that challenges their preconceptions.

So you might say that this is a trait that is considered essential for being a good member of your social group?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I fear this is the wrong take on this issue. The rule communities should follow should not be "make sure to get the facts right so that you don't excommunicate those who get the facts right". It should be "don't excommunicate people who get the facts wrong, because you never know if you got them right yourself and if you punish dissidents too hard you'll never be able to shift toward the correct world view".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] StormWalker@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 months ago

Jehovah's Witnesses. The ones that do leave never get to see or speak to their family and friends ever again.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

Fun fact, you can let people be wrong.

This is something I learned when my father started to forget everything.... And I mean everything.

I was surprised he knew his own name sometimes. Don't get me wrong, I'm not disparaging him, these were facts. Everything is in past tense because he's now six feet under. I'm neither happy nor sad about it. I sometimes miss him, but I had a very vague idea of the suffering he endured in the last few years of his life; I'm happy that his suffering has ended, but I'm sorry that was the only conclusion he was going to get from his condition.

Back to the point at hand, when he was starting to forget, it was often more harmful and confusing to try to correct him. He wouldn't understand, and he would end up confused, then he would forget why he's confused, and the cycle would start again because he would ask the same questions about things that were not real. Either those things never existed, and were just a product of his brain slowing deteriorating, or they were from so far in his history that he wasn't making sense.

It was far far less problematic for him if I accepted whatever he told me as his reality, and put myself into that reality, rather than trying to drag him back to this reality. He was clearly confused, mistaken, and sometimes outright wrong in what he was saying, maybe it was based on something he learned in school that was later debunked or something, but it was really common.

For his sake, I stopped bringing him to our reality. I don't need to remind him 10x a day that his wife left him, so any questions regarding where she is or when she'll be home, I deflected; "she's gone out"/"I don't know when she'll return" I tried not to lie to him, just give him enough information to answer his questions, but not enough to rock the boat of his fragile reality. In reality, she's gone out (to live with her new husband), and I don't know when she'll return (probably never).

A few years prior, he considered his ex wife to be dead to him. There was a religious component on that, I'm not going to go into it, but he had very strong feelings about it that seemed to go away.

It was so severe that she actually visited him when he was sent into a care facility (my brother and I simply didn't have the time, training, or skillset to continue to care for him). When she visited, she was his "wife". All him about it after, and he wouldn't even realize that she had been by. It was so genuine that the staff called and asked about it, saying his "wife" was just there. I quickly corrected them (I was his POA).

Letting people be wrong is basically a superpower. You can have a completely crazy conversation with someone, and walk away with a better understanding of who they are. Along pointed questions and watching their brain try to figure it out in real time. I usually go for stuff surrounding why they believe what they believe in a non-threatening way. Try to make them really think about why they believe what they do. Some people just invent information to justify their position and it doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. I usually don't scrutinize, I play nice, but it's an interesting exercise.

My favorite justification is "tradition". Ok, but why is it tradition? Is it just that "we've always done this, so that's what we do" or was it done one way in the past four a good reason, which no longer applies? My favorite story about tradition, which I have no idea if it's real or not, is that when preparing a ham for some celebration (maybe Thanksgiving or Christmas or something), they cut the end off of the ham before cooking it, and someone questioned why. Well, there's four generations in the house, let's ask grandma/great grandma. The answer to why this tradition started? Because her husband always bought the biggest ham he could, and she never had cookware large enough for it to fit into. The fact is, some traditions based on a need that no longer exists, or they may be to fix a problem that no longer exists.

If you can successfully provoke them to think and question their reasons for believing what they do, you might just get them to open their own eyes.

Simply put, you cannot fix them. By arguing against what they believe to be true, you're forcing them to justify their belief, in doing so, they convince themselves of their belief, which does more damage. Psychology is weird man.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I used to feel like this. not anymore.

I may have lost some friends, but I gained new ones. win-win imo

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

But we can’t even process reality as it is. Our brains can’t handle it and hallucinate the gaps. Someone who might think their opinions are based on reality might base it on a lie that their brain made up subconsciously. Hence why eyewitness statements are not treated as a cold hard fact.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago (47 children)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Me and veganism relationships

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The interesting thing is I can't tell if you're talking about yourself as vegan, others who are vegan, or veganism as a concept.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

Nah it's not you, it's me phrasing my thoughts so no one understands shit

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Oh it will happen too. But it's worth it.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dear everybody: Your heart is a irrational, stubborn, reactionary idiot. It makes some valid points, but it should always be weighed against what your brain has to say. And that's assuming your brain isn't also being an idiot at the time. Man us humans are stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Agnotology is a very interesting way of studying this. Also, I'm vegan.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›