this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
681 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2295 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

He. Tried. To. Kill. You.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

How does Mike Pence have any donors? I mean literally who would give him money? He's not even trying to win. Clearly he's not you don't try to win and then do this for your biggest opponent. I mean most of them aren't trying to win. This entire Republican primary is basically just a fundraising endeavor to furnish their own private lavish lifestyles.

[–] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So a convicted felon can lose their right to vote, but they can still be President. Gottit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's put everything up to a direct popular vote. Just direct democracy. Why does Congress get to overrule the "will of the American people" when it makes laws?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that Pence can turn around and start sucking off of Trump again, even after Trump literally tried to have him lynched for doing his job, shows how spineless the Republicans really are

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If the crimes didn't include insurrection I'd agree with him. It seems we've carved out a specific exemption for that.

[–] Fluffgar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, if it was a convicted-for-shoplifting situation, and the person had completed the sentence, that would be one thing. But this? Even seeing it from halfway across the world, what happened was shocking.

[–] mupomo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Aren’t elected officials supposed to represent the people? Why don’t they just do their jobs?

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Bro they want to murder you!

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He didn't accept it last time the American people rejected him.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Okay, then YOU should be disqualified alongside him, you Vanilla Tic-Tac.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the people want to elect a convicted criminal, disqualifying him isnt going to solve the real problem you have

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] donuts@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

This is a level of over-the-top milquetoast fence-sitting that only Mike Pence can achieve...
The Republicans are a fucking caricature of themselves, I swear.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I mean Pence decided not to leave it to the American people when Trump encouraged them to hang him. He ran away and hid.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Pandering much?

[–] HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Of course he said that because if Trump is disqualified because of J6, then so would also half the GOP's varsity team from Congress. I think if all of Trump's in-government co-conspirators (just to name a few, but not an exhaustive list: Meadows, Scott, Hawley, Boebert, Gaetz, Greene, etc.) were expelled and never allowed to return to government, I'm pretty sure at least half those seats would go to middle of the road Democrats (I mean at least Boebert's seat, minimum) and the GOP would lose their razor thin margin in the Senate.

I think this is one of the many major reasons Pence keeps towing this line for Trump.

[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The fear of the Cheeto Pudding among GOP contenders is almost funny. But not really.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Not related to the headline/article, I'd just like to comment on funniness the picture, from left to right: confused disbelief, dismissive disbelief, indignant disbelief. Much furrowing of brows, such concern.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit."

  • W.C. Fields
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[–] SpamCamel@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While Trump is obviously a POS and I'd love for him to be banned from running, not allowing anyone to run for office from prison would set a really dangerous precedent.

[–] Soulg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 14th amendment disqualifies him. Prison is irrelevant, but the constitution is just as irrelevant when it is just selectively ignored for convenience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It would be because of prison; it would be because of leading an insurrection. These aren't even close to the same.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›