this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2021
0 points (NaN% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
594 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mike_Penis@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Germany lost the war in december of 41 when their advance was halted. They literally only planned for like a 6 month campaign because halder was like yeah they will surrender after we take moscow lol

[–] Florn@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't siege Leningrad, take it immediately

[–] LeninWalksTheWorld@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

just take Leningrad immediately but also "zurge rush" (lmao) Stalingrad at the same time. Like yeah okay I'm sure the Nazis (famous for Blitzkrieg not close combat) can handle two of the most intense urban warfare battles at once hundreds of kilometers apart without getting their ass owned.

taking Stalingrad wouldn't even cut off the oil either the Soviets had made preparations to ship Caucasian oil across the Caspian Sea to Astrakhan to keep the military fueled. It would have been awfully inefficient logistically but they would have been able to do it.

[–] ultraviolet@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

The Soviets weren't going to let them have the Caucasus oil either. There were comprehensive plans to destroy the oil infrastructure if that area was ever lost.

[–] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

focus on RAF facilities

  1. britain had radar before the nazis
  2. the raf turned every flat bit of ground into an airstrip
  3. easier to bomb a city than a random field in the middle of nowhere
  4. those airstrips had aa guns and, you know, fighters in them
[–] The_Walkening@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ally with the Slavs against the commies

"Hey Stepan, I know I called you and your people subhuman, but c'mon man... there's communists and they're bad....so....."

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Ally with the Slavs against the commies

"Hey Stepan, I know I called you and your people subhuman, but c'mon man... there's communists and they're bad....so....."

This is actually the least ridiculous part because Eastern European fascists constantly go for this reasoning lmao. :wonder-who-thats-for:

[–] richietozier4@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

hides file folder labeled Generalplan Ost come onnnnn, we have so much in common!

[–] toledosequel@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

"ALLIED POWERS SURRENDER AFTER LEARNING MUSSOLINI NO LONGER A REMOVED "

[–] LeninsRage@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How Hitler could have won:

Don't start an unwinnable war

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

im czech but even from a general strategic viewpoint, why the fuck did he think starting war with poland was a good idea? you already have annexed like 4 countries scot-free. the polish were even willing to trade the polish corridor for something else. fascists are so stupid

like im glad that war happened cause otherwise czech culture might not exist (even members of my family were kidnapped) but like jeez how stupid

[–] LeninsRage@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Nazis had to continuously pursue their revanchist aims and win in order to maintain popular legitimacy. The German economy was also disastrously overheated and on the precipice of catastrophic collapse, which was only prevented by going to war, getting insanely lucky against France, and then plundering continental Europe for needed raw materials and wealth. The Nazis had maneuvered into a position where they had to go to war for their regime to survive, by design.

They also, like all fascists, were ideologically incapable of objectively evaluating the perceived strength of their enemies. Hitler gambled that Britain and France would back down again, and gambled again that the Wehrmacht had the capability to defeat them quickly.