this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
53 points (98.2% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

3574 readers
2 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!

Rules:

If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.

If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sunaurus@lemm.ee
53
Lemmy just passed 1 million users! (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago by realitista@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

That's a 2000% increase in 2 weeks! Congratulations all! I'm so proud of what we are building together here!

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a lot of BS accounts tallied from BS instances in the user counts. The bots are coming out in force. If that was a million actual humans that would be pretty impressive. But still there's a lot of real people and growth is big, but the total user stats are misleading. Looking at comment and post counts provides a better idea, it's about doubled since the beginning of this month. Still nothing to sneeze at.

[–] filip@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm doing my part!

[–] stux@geddit.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yesss and around 800K are spam accounts.. :(

[–] zero_iq@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Also a way to harvest personal data and passwords, and drive traffic to instances.

New users tend to register with the busiest servers. So, start your own instance, flood it with fake users to get to the top of the rankings. Tweak Lemmy to store passwords instead of hashes. Allow open registration, sit back and wait for people to sign up with their emails and potentially-reused passwords.

Ranking instances by number of users drives undesirable behaviours all-round.

[–] Pertinax@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh wow. Is that common? Thankfully I don't reuse any passwords, but I can see this working really well. Scary

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I've seen estimates that suggest over 50% of all traffic on the net is bots.

[–] lazy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I guess this is a potential disadvantage to decentralization. With a centralized site, the owner would have a vested interest in the security of the site because culpability for stolen passwords or other nefarious things would fall back to them. Here, with a decentralized model, instance owners can manipulate the particular instance to not match others and do nefarious things. Up to now I had only heard of the benefits of decentralization and hadn't thought of this. Food for thought perhaps. All it takes is a few or even one nefarious instance (if its bad enough) to spoil the general public's thought on this model.

[–] stux@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh wow.. That's dark haha!

But that goes with every service on the internet with accounts ;-) It would always be best to run your own if you can but I certainly can imagine not everyone can do that so trust is also a big factor

Luckily there's more than just total users that make up the stats for an instance so it's a little easier to evalutate and chose I guess

[–] zero_iq@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not really the same, because most services online are centralised, so you're only putting your trust into one organisation. With the fediverse, you might not even know who's behind the instance (especially when you're new), and it depends on trust and cooperation between multiple actors.

You're sharing trust across multiple servers, code developers, etc. and different aspects of your data and your experience are affected by many different actors, some of whom could be malicious, and whose security protocols, principles, and levels of trustworthiness and reliability are unknown and untested.

In some ways that's better, in some ways that's worse. But it's early days... Given the vast numbers of bot sign-ups and new servers added very recently, there are clearly bad faith actors at work, and we're going to have to evolve to deal with them.

[–] Itty53@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right? We've known for well over a decade that user counts are meaningless and never reflect truth. But if it benefits your guy, oh, let's celebrate!

This is a generally BAD thing for Lemmy. Bots are going to kill it and we're letting them nest.

[–] filip@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it usually gives you the upper limit of the number of users and the order of magnitude. If Twitter says they have 330 M monthly active users, that probably means that between 1% and 99% of those are actual users. It's not a perfect statistic, but it gives you some context.

[–] Itty53@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Say I'm an investor. And I want to invest in a business. And that business tells me "we have 330 million customers" and then come to find out, they only have 3.3 million customers .. I'm gonna call that fraud and courts should too.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far I haven't noticed a major spam problem, let's hope this holds up.

[–] stux@geddit.social 1 points 1 year ago

Correct ;-) These are 'idle' accounts but im afraid of what they might do

See these numbers: https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy

They don't make any sense

[–] DanSlab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Screw reddit

[–] filip@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Where did you get that screenshot?

load more comments
view more: next ›