this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
75 points (96.3% liked)

Formula 1

9097 readers
97 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Max's 2019 move lmao, came with receipts

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Great analysis.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

After the crash, Max drove his car back to the pits shedding carbon and rubber around the circuit. Wasn't it very recently that a 3 place grid penalty next race was handed out for doing the same thing?

[–] l_b_i@yiffit.net 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Perez was a clear retirement, there was no repair possible. The rear wing assembly could have fallen off. The only reason he brought the car back is the team told him to to avoid the possibility of a safety car.

As far as I know, Max only maybe had slight damage from the contact, plus the loose tire, drivers regularly drive back to the pits in this configuration. They don't usually keep racing/defending with a flat tire though.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 7 points 5 months ago

Norris was shedding even more though!

They could have both made it back safely if they went slower, but good luck getting them to do that after that fight.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you truly suggesting that people should retire from now on if they have a punctureΒΏ?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

What I'm suggesting is there is no constancy in the way the FIA determines their own rules.

[–] urquell@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think the first move was fine as it's a single move into the corner. At least I've seen that before.

The final one though, max at fault 100%. Even tried to run him off afterwards.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Slight movement under braking especially when that movement is towards the apex of the corner has been done for years. Bad but still has precedence.

[–] urquell@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Yep, agreed.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

The fact it's a British driver/team and the British GP is this week just adds shit for everyone to stir up. I'm expecting the circus to even more unbearable for the next few weeks.

Loving the fact we have competition at the front though!