this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Coffee

8367 readers
2 users here now

β˜• - The hot beverage that powers the world!

Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!

Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am currently using 40g coffee to 500g water which is 12.5g coffee to 1g water but I have seen things like this https://www.olympiacoffee.com/blogs/blog/how-to-brew-like-olympia-coffee#:~:text=For%20those%20of%20you%20who,use%2016.7%20grams%20of%20water. which suggest using a little more. Does it even matter to adjust the ratio precisely if I don't have a precision grinder and am using a Krups blade grinder? I am trying to get things as precise as possible.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smokelessndepressed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm enjoying the V60 recipe from the last James Hoffmann book (The best coffee at home). 60 gr per liter. I experienced a lot with other recipes and ratios during the past few years, but this one is super easy to reproduce and makes great coffee every time you are awake enough to follow a 3 step guide. πŸ˜ͺ

Does it even matter to adjust the ratio precisely if I don’t have a precision grinder and am using a Krups blade grinder?

Yes. Your coffee uniformity and your ratio are different things. You should check this video from the one and only Mr Hoffmann.
In any case, if you are enjoying your pourovers, you may want to invest in a better but cheap hand grinder. Timemore makes great products at an affordable price.

[–] pixiecata@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here, or 15g for 225ml water per cup. I use a Timemore C2 grinder.

[–] smokelessndepressed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have the old C2 with the plastic wheel and it's an excellent grinder tbh. I think I paid around 50€ and it's more than enough from a hobbyist perspective.

[–] pixiecata@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I upgraded the plastic parts to metal parts last year. Very happy with that decision.

[–] Lowered_lifted@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well yes I very much know I need to upgrade, but to what? I am usually making cups for 1 to 2 people so 500-1000ml. Actually nvm, I am using a Fellow kettle so it only holds 900ml

Ok, those are big cups. I usually made around 250 to 300ml of coffee. Timemore and 1zpresso have big grinders now, you may want one of those. I bought a C2 a few years ago and even though I have a good electric grinder, the Timemore is miles better and because it doesn't make almost any noise, I can make coffee early in the morning.
In my case, I am the only one at home that drinks coffee so I rarely need more than 25g.

[–] infraredcactus@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

It depends. I bought a good but not really fast hand grinder (commandante c40) and despite myself being lazy I really like it for single person pour overs, which I do most of the time since my SO doesn't drink coffee. However, when I have guests and need to grind a bigger dose (>30g), I get a little bit annoyed at how much work it is. So I'd probably recommend getting an electric grinder if you do those portions all the time.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like most basic entry-level coffee nerds, I do whatever James Hoffman tells me to, so I use ~15g of coffee to 250g of water (which is equivalent to the 1 to 16.7 ratio suggested in your link).

I think it's still worth playing around with ratios regardless of grinder, it definitely could still make a substantial difference in your cup. However, switching to a decent burr grinder would be a massive difference both in quality of results, but (perhaps more importantly) reproducibility. Blade grinders make it harder to achieve the same grind size every time, and even within a single dose the ground consistency won't be great.

A caveat I'd like to add: blades are known to produce a lot of fines, which causes higher extraction. So maybe the lower-than-typical ratio you've ended up on "compensates" a bit for the high extraction. At the end of the day though, remember: who cares what some website/James Hoffman/random Fediverse users have to say? Do you like the coffee you make?

[–] Lowered_lifted@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nah the coffee I make could definitely be better. I think a better grinder will definitely help.

[–] Lowered_lifted@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Nah the coffee I make could definitely be better. I think a better grinder will definitely help.

[–] mifilmi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm using 60g/L, the best ratio in my opinion. I grind it using Timemore C2 and brew it using Hario Switch.

[–] kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mugen: 1:18 usually, V60: 1:16ish. (Light and medium roasts)

Ratio will depend on preference, equipment, and what coffee you're brewing, as well as the recipe. In my case I use a bit longer ratio on the Mugen compared to the V60 because it has less bypass (less water gets around the coffee by going through the filter too soon). Generally speaking folks use shorter ratios for darker roasts and longer ratios for lighter roasts.

It gets a little more complicated with iced coffee, because what you're doing with iced coffee is actually brewing a very short ratio and then diluting it, which gives you a concentration that is similar to what you would normally get, but with lower extraction. (Not necessarily a bad thing!)

[–] iamlyth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn’t know about the Mugen until I read this comment! Fascinated that new pour over designs keep coming out.

[–] mifilmi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, Mugen is fantastic brewer. It's a "low by-pass" type, producing smooth brew. And the pour can be continuous. Here's a picture of it.

[–] iamlyth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude that just looks gorgeous

[–] mifilmi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

How can we rotate the picture? I posted it from Jerboa...

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With blade grinder, ratio has an effect but the grind quality is definitely effecting more. I go with the 16.7 ratio for years with coarse grind and the coffee is really good every morning.

I'd suggest getting a good burr grinder. That has the biggest effect for getting a quality cup every morning.

I personally do a 20g:300ml for hot coffee or 20g: ~320ml for iced coffee (only approximate because of the ice cubes)

So that ends up being a 15ml per 1g

Also i think you mixed up coffee and water in your post, isn't it 12.5g water to 1g coffee.

Does it even matter to adjust the ratio precisely if I don't have a precision grinder and am using a Krups blade grinder? I am trying to get things as precise as possible.

Consistency allows for reproducible results but there's diminishing returns at a certain point. My grinder is the type that has a big hopper and runs for Ο‡ amount of seconds and I don't notice a difference even though it can be up to 1g up or down.

[–] UTJD16@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Depends on the recipe I’m using, but generally between 1:15 and 1:17 grams coffee:water. I use a manual conical burr (1zpresso KMax) for my pour overs.

[–] Quill7513@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago
[–] thegreenpizza@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I find that a 16:1 or 17:1 ratio delivers the coffee flavor more reliably. But, most morning I forgo this and do a 20:1 or more just so I have more to drink over time. The higher ratios, being weaker, seem to be more forgiving in terms of bitterness (makes sense cause the flavor is more watered down).

[–] halfempty@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

For pour-over I use 350ml (350grams) of filtered water, to 24g of medium course ground coffee.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 2 points 1 year ago

1:12.5 seems really high, imo. I've always been told 1:16-1:18 and get good results. I agree with the other comment in that a new grinder is what you should be considering

[–] NotTheVacuum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I started with 60g/L scaled down to a 28g dose because it’s a good amount of brewed coffee for me and it means a bag of 12oz coffee is 12 cups with a little cushion. That works out to 466g (or ml) of water, but I have found I like it slightly better closer to 450g.

[–] Bitswap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just learned I'm hanging out with the wrong crowd. I've always been told I make strong coffee...learning it may have been an inside joke.

I use a French press and (I just measured as I didn't know) I use 26g coffee to 950ml water. Makes a ratio of about 1:36.

[–] Lowered_lifted@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

French press requires less coffee as the extraction is far longer, your brew is plenty strong.

You reversed your coffee and water in the 12.5:1 portion.

Measuring is important for repeatability but getting a good grinder should be your highest priority. A Timemore C2 will be a huge improvement over the blade grinder. You should be able to find one for around $60 most places.

15 grams of water to 1 gram of beans normally. I might adjust it a little depending on the bean.

[–] kerneltux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I switched to pour-over, I didn't want to futz with figuring out the proper ratio, so I bought a grinder that produces pre-measured amounts, and a pitcher with measurement lines. So I go with the "2 cups" measurement on both.

...and yes, I know that I'm doing it wrong. ;-P

[–] Lowered_lifted@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you like your coffee you are doing it right

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί