I really like this post. While I'm a self-proclaimed tinkerer, running window managers, Arch and NixOS, I never really understood gaming on Linux: it jusy went over my head, with all the Heroic, Bottles, Lutris, launching through Steam, etc. It feels like I should have understood it months ago. It's so simple once you see someone describe it simply and properly. Thank you so much for that. I can't describe how much I appreciate it.

I like that you even talked about the issues with NTFS as well!

Nice article. Thought about putting it on github /gitlab? It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on non flatpak for steam and flatpak for heroic.

This is a solid guide to help people who are not familiar with all the tools we use. I have some suggestions for you to perhaps improve (these are small details that, in my case, have been helpful to me):

1. You say this about compatibility layers: "Expect a minor performance hit as a result of running them through a compatibility layer." According to what I've read about and experienced, using compatibility layers such as Wine and Proton can give you a wide variety of results, depending on the game. Sometimes you get a performance boost. Sometimes you get the same performance. If the compatibility layer is missing something the game might need - like a specific dll file - you can have a performance issue. Anyway, the benefit of using a compatibility layer over an emulator is that yes, indeed, sometimes the software works better in the compatibility layer.
2. Maybe make people a little less fearful of using Proton in Heroic Games Launcher? I would recommend, based on my experience, to give Proton a try before using a Wine prefix. I've had so much success with Proton in Heroic Games Launcher, especially using the Proton Experimental branch. You can always try Proton and see what happens (the Proton DB has user experiences from using Heroic Games Launcher, not just Steam). If it sucks, you can try something else. Also, there are ways to use Proton in Lutris and Bottles. There are plenty of instructions out there on how to do it. It's actually very helpful to have this option. My point: make it clear to people that they have options. There is more than one way to make a Windows game work which is a good thing. Different Wine versions, different Proton versions, different ways to set them up for each individual game. If one way doesn't get you the desired results, you can try a different method. There's always hope and there are plenty of people online that might be able to help you if you can't get something to work.
3. There are distros designed for gaming that come with lots of stuff already packaged with the installation. These include Garuda and Nobara. I've recently switched from Fedora to Nobara (which is essentially Fedora with modifications) and I'm very happy. I honestly believe these distros are very friendly to gamers who are not too familiar with Linux. For example, when I installed Nobara, there was nothing for me to do after. No installing launchers, etc. I did have to enable Proton on Steam, but that was about it. It's really amazing how user-friendly Linux has become in some distros. Anyway, I also enjoy Arch Linux and I like having control over everything, doing things myself. Maybe you could change your text to explain that there are different distros to make a variety of people happy? If you like to tinker a lot, you can choose Arch. If you want an "out of the box" approach you can use a distro targeted at gamers. Maybe you'd prefer something in between, like Fedora, which needs some tinkering after installation.
4. Maybe add something about Steam and its offerings of native Linux games. People would be surprised if they payed more attention. Quite a few games that people usually play on their Windows machines are also available for Linux, which means those games don't need Proton at all to run. You could get lucky, do you know what I mean? If your Steam library already has games in it for which there's a native Linux version, you can assess whether or not you need a dual boot system at all. I'm one of the lucky ones. I no longer need to run Windows (recent development, I'm so happy). All my games work in a Linux environment now. It feels friggin' great to get rid of Windows completely.

Anyway, sorry for the huge comment. Although I'm making suggestions for improvement, please know that my comment is this long because I'm very enthusiastic about your guide. A nice overview of everything a gamer needs to learn about is all there in your guide and this is something that people need if they're migrating from Windows. You are very generous in taking the time to write this and I'm sure you're going to help a lot of people who feel lost or don't know where to start. Great job and thank you!

I tried Lutris and Bottles, but I didn't give Heroic much of a shot. Personally, I think Bottles is the nicest one, though I'm still using Lutris. Although, for my use case (Japanese language visual novels), Lutris makes it easier to select Japanese Locale for specific games, and hopefully with the next release, it will let you choose Locale when installing games: https://github.com/lutris/lutris/issues/4935

I think the Lutris Installer is generally less finicky than Heroic and Bottles as it automatically detects the game executable after installation. It isn't always successful, but it usually is.

Does the Heroic Flatpak bundle a runtime similar to the Lutris Runtime? It seems to imply that it bundles Wine versions, but what about all the other usual dependencies, like DXVK, Faudio, etc.? There doesn't seem to be much information on that.

I'll share the one thing that made my life much easier: Gamescope. So many visual novels don't fullscreen properly, and Gamescope is a great workaround for that. The upscaling stuff is nice too.

Great article. Interesting you went with Heroic, as a relatively new Linux gamer I do find Lutris easier to work with since most of the settings have toggles. But I have both installed anyway haha

@popcar2 yes, the ntfs problem hit me as well, as I previously commented on other occasions. Also, I didn't think that intel mobile integrated gpu's wouldn't be recognised by opengl or vulkan, but that's how it goes apparently

A very neat article!

"Note: I don't recommend installing the Flatpak version of Steam. It has some issues specific to Flatpak, and makes your Steam files difficult to reach which can be annoying. Use your package manager instead."

What issues? I've been usin the Flatpak for more than a year without issues, both on Silverblue and on Arch. On the other side I had games not running with the version on the repos with Arch and Nobara.

And difficult to reach files how? Just add a shortcut on Files or Dolphin to the Steam folder for easy navigation.

Edit: saying not to use the Flatpak version is like saying not to use the Steam runtime.