this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
701 points (95.1% liked)

Comics

5914 readers
14 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thessnake03@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 55 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Alt text there:

I can't remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you're saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it's not literally illegal to express.

I totally agree, it's like calling your opponent bot, voids a lot of what you have to say

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

it's like calling your opponent bot, voids a lot of what you have to say

That's not quite the same. When calling someone a bot, or nazi, or any other group, you are more explicitly saying " I see zero value in arguing with you and expect that you will only be arguing in bad faith, so I am not going to humor you", and also serves as an at least attempted black mark.

It's overall just a tactic to end an argument sucinctly, by trying to say "this argument has run its course, I am cutting it off here"

Every group does it. communists call people libs or nazis, leftists call people tankies or nazis or zionists, liberals call people hippies, nazis, commies, anarchists, etc... and conservatives call people by every word in the book.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Lenin straight up says that in the "freedom of criticism" section of "what is to be done"

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. I’ve often said you’re free to speak, but you’re also free to suffer the consequences of doing so. We don’t have to silently suffer the bullshit coming from everyone else’s mouths.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

And you're not necessarily free to speak, depending on what you're saying and where you're saying it. As the comic says, "free speech" refers to consequences from the government, not anyone else.

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Very true. Try screaming “FIRE!!!” in a crowded theater. It doesn’t really go down too well.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

It is worth noting - there is a moral right to free expression. Laws can only reflect that.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago

Do you want to post it? This one is very good

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 months ago (14 children)

There's a lot of irony to this comic being posted on .ml, given the current discussion about censorship issues on this instance

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

.world posting about censorship when they preemptively censor any discussion about piracy is hilarious.

They were never even warned by authorities, one of the admins is paranoid and loves intellectual property.

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

Reading that post, the OP linked an unsourced Imgur album with blatant lies like "10,000 people were incinerated and hosed down drains" spliced between actual photos of the protest is fucking wild. The 10,000 figure was reported once then immediately retracted, the fact that OP was posting blatant propaganda as fact was conveniently left out as "tankie censorship".

Let's put that into perspective: US intelligence officially puts the number below 900. The OP was saying it's over 10,000. It's an order of magnitude above the 3 letter agencies of the US.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

Lmao those fucking losers "preemptively" defederated from hexbear, every one of those hypocritical libs can eat my ass

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It must be cathartic to make cartoons about an argument you want to have where the other person is silenced by your point. Most of the time, the guy on the left in this cartoon would continue to argue and reject everything you say.

As evidence, watch a video of anyone arguing with MTG.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Who's arguing against Magic The Gathering??

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

If it were a true conversation then it would have had to have been a 6 square comic strip instead and the last two squares would have been him not shutting up and a thought bubble by the intelligent one thinking he should have just decked the idiot instead of trying to reason with him.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Or Dawkins gradually giving up on Wendy whats-her-face.

'But where is the evidence?'

'This is the evidence. This is what evidence looks like. This is how evidence works. Do you see?'

'Yes, but where is the evidence?'

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Spam or Abuse

Protip: check who the mods are before reporting.

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can't criticise something cause a mod posted it?

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

no, but this specific report is obviously made in bad faith and expect the mods to just blindly remove something just because a report exists.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Many reports are either “Spam or Abuse” or “Breaks Community Rules,” without further elaboration. Often, like in this case, they are not compelling arguments. We’re not swayed by lazy, generic crybullying. In fact it may earn one a temp ban.

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Understandable :)

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Makes sense

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 5 months ago

"Free speech is the right to yell 'theater' in a crowded fire."

- "An old yippie proverb" (I think that was the attribution? This came from Abby Hoffman's Steal This Book.)

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Freedom of Speech != Obligation to Listen

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He seems to be on board by the last panel, lol

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Sonic is always open to learning.

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

i'll never take away your freedom of speech, bigoted guy, i love dunking on idiots

you are just frustrated that you can't say it without any pushback, because your parents didn't love you enough to raise you and teach you emotional regulation (or anything else worthwhile)

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I respect the sentiment, but I recently read "Exiting the Vampire Castle" by Mark Fisher and he makes some good points for why callout culture is, shall we say, "less than productive" in some situations.

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

calling out actually bigoted shit and the purity cult that fisher described in the essay are two different things

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Really? Are you saying this in reference to the essay of his that starts with:

‘Left-wing’ Twitter can often be a miserable, dispiriting zone. Earlier this year, there were some high-profile twitterstorms, in which particular left-identifying figures were ‘called out’ and condemned. What these figures had said was sometimes objectionable; but nevertheless, the way in which they were personally vilified and hounded left a horrible residue: the stench of bad conscience and witch-hunting moralism.

Because if you are, then I guess you didn't read the article, huh?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

'Free speech means you can't say that to me!' is a succinct demonstration of how some people don't mean things when they say words.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I like the noses

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have never seen this situation happen

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Congratulations.