this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
84 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5222 readers
854 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
84
Corporations invested in carbon offsets that were ‘likely junk’, analysis says (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paf0@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Not surprising. The entire idea is kind of dumb to begin with. Sure, let's not make any meaningful reduction in our emissions and attempt to pay someone to clean up our pollution instead. If anything there should be a carbon tax that goes toward verified programs. There is no way having corporations randomly throw money at grifters will ever work out.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean yeah, no shit. The idea that you could buy off your carbon footprint was always ridiculous. It reminds me of letters of indulgence.

Are there legit credits? Yeah probably, but who is overseeing it? What’s stopping a polluter from faking it?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's been overseen by a bunch of verification bodies (eg: Verra) which don't seem to have any real objection to the fact that they're blessing fraudulent credits.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Right. There are so many links in this chain that could cause the entire thing to break. Corruption in the verification bodies. Fake credits. Deception about actually buying credits.

We’re talking really large sums of money too. Like if I take an aeroplane I can tack on a significant sum to “offset” my fare, and I have absolutely no guarantee that that money doesn’t just end up in the CEOs pockets.

Sure, the company could say “of course we won’t just take the money and run”, and as we all know, companies never lie.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I should start selling carbon credits. I'm just as legit as everyone else. I even have a few potted plants.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I support this. You probably deserve money more than all those billionaires that are currently profiting off them.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

I haven't committed fraud, genocide, I'm only accidentally racist on rare occasion, and I never been bribed. You literally can't find a better source for Sabatas Carbon-based Super Credits.