this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22270 readers
334 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] context@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

nerd actually there were no bathtubs full of blood, so technically according to the oxford-mirriam-webster's collegiate abridged dictionary of very useful words, you do not have permission to describe the horrifying deaths of dozens of starving refugees as a "bloodbath" so i will thank you very much to discontinue your use of that term in these circumstances

[–] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

Also, trump said the auto industry would be a bloodbath. Why are you helping trump?

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 5 months ago

".... But with any luck, there is a chance that all of the Israeli soldiers still die in a blood bath so brutal, that not even their sperm will survive".

[–] twinnie 1 points 5 months ago

You’re clearly selectively quoting to try to support some narrative that the BBC are biased for Israel here. They’re obviously just talking about a very current operation that’s happened since the strike on the camp. The BBC have actually been presenting their own evidence of war crimes committed by Israel and they’ve constantly been reporting on civilian deaths. To say they’re biased in favour of Israel is ridiculous.

Just the very next paragraph after your quote reads: “Their operations so far have not resulted in a bloodbath. But that’s exactly what last night’s air strike achieved”.