this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
16 points (86.4% liked)

PlayStation | PS5

3109 readers
2 users here now

For All PlayStation and PS5 Content, Join us at !playstation@lemmy.world.


The PlayStation 5 community for Lemmy!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No console wars. We are all gamers.
  4. Be a decent human.
  5. No piracy talk, links, or directions to copy-written content. Emulation discussions are allowed.
  6. No NSFW content, shilling, self promotion, ads, spam, low effort posts, memes, trolling, etc.
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Have fun!

Other Gaming Communities:

Remote Play Resources:


For questions, collabs, or really anything, message me directly at: @cosmicsploogedrizzle:matrix.org


SEO Tags: PlayStation 5 , PS5 , Game , Gaming , Games , Sony , Studios , Nintendo , Xbox , Microsoft , Next Gen , Unreal , Decima Engine , Exclusive , Dualshock , Dualsense , Dual Sense , SIE , Sony Interactive Entertainment , HBO , The Last of Us , Horizon , Spiderman , Spider-man , Spider Man , God of War , PSVR , Virtual Reality , MLB , Returnal , Death Stranding , Ratchet and Clank , Ghost of Tsushima , Demon’s Souls , Naughty Dog , Santa Monica , Housemarque , Sucker Punch , Bungie , Destiny , Insomniac , Guerilla , Bend , Asobi , San Diego

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • 5cm Shorter
  • Detachable Disc Drive
  • 2 USB-C Ports on the front
  • Redesigned face plates

Source: https://bbs.a9vg.com/thread-8930782-1-1.html

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A slim model makes far more sense than a Pro model, at least.

There's nothing better that a Pro console could really do, but a slimmed down model would be beneficial because the ordinary one is the size of a house.

[–] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean 60fps gaming at not sub 1080p resolutions on a Pro would be nice (see latest Final Fantasy for example) and just being able to get performance mode frame rates with quality mode graphics in games would be cool.

I think there is value in both a slim and Pro model.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would be happy if there was no pro version for that generation.

It used to be that consoles were a stable hardware for an entire generation and optimization was the difference between a good developer and a bad one.

If you wanted to have more performance every 3 years, then PC was the way to go.

So I really hope that they just tested water with the ps4 pro and that they don’t reproduce the experiment again.

[–] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you don't want them to make a Pro console because FOMO?

The base PS4 still worked great even well into the PS5 generation with games like Ragnarok. Neither the PS4 Pro or PS5 made that a poor experience. Devs don't even want to leave base PS4 players behind almost 3 years into this gen, base PS5 owners will be fine and remain the vast majority of users. If you don't want to upgrade, just don't.

And it's not like you have to buy new/additional hardware to play some games like in the past as all games would support the PS5. Unlike the Genesis which had Sega CD and 32X. GameBoy had GameBoy Color only games. N64 had expansion pak required games. DS had the DSiWare and 3DS had New 3DS only/enhanced games. The 360 started to require the HDD late in life for some games.

I just think that developers are allocating resources to have features for these pro consoles. I’d prefer if they just optimized the experience for everyone.

But you’re right about one thing, I’ve kept playing on the base ps4 until the end of the generation and I’ve been able to enjoy a lot of games.

[–] cuzit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like the two USBC ports so I don’t have to continuously swap out my PS4 ssd and PSVR. That said, if the “detachable disk drive” uses one of the USBC ports… meh.

[–] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why use a front port for your SSD? Can't you just use a rear USB-A 3.0 port? It'd be less cluttered assuming this is a semi-permanent attachment.

[–] cuzit@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d have to buy another cable, the ssd came with USBC-USBC. And I have an external spinning disk hdd plugged in there, for video captures and whatnot. I’m using all my ports.

[–] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's 2 USB-A ports on the back so SSD and HDD and then PSVR in the front USB-C and that leaves you with a USB-A 2.0 for charging or whatever. For like $7 you don't have to mess with switching cables, unless I'm missing a device.