About damn time, they should never have disabled it in the first place.
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
917 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37608 readers
216 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Let's just appreciate the fact that basically no other browser has this.
With chrome/ium you can't even block ads.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Now, if only iOS would allow true Safari alternatives. 🥲
They'll soon be forced to allow sideloading, in the EU at least. Should open the doors for proper alternative browsers.
I loathe the very fact they made people call it "sideloading". It's just installing on your own terms, like it used to be the norm.
Well, it's a carry over from its early days in how it used to work. You needed to install things via USB debugger. Generally that's all sideloading ever meant, transferring information from one device to another using a generally "local" method (SD card, USB, etc). Now sideloading, on Android at least (as it retains its original meaning elsewhere), just means not from the official repository.
I just activated Windows 10 on a laptop I bought from ebay, and I was reminded that Microsoft too wants people to view its official store as the default way to obtain software.
One of my goals for this weekend is to set up a dual boot for Linux Mint, which I've never done before. I'm fully aware of its limitations, but I'm getting so tired of all this crap.
load more comments
(11 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I use FF on android for a couple months now. Solid browser and sync to desktol and add blocker are nice.
BUT: their page reloading is far too aggressive. You can't buy anything online, since once 2FA is required and you need to open your bank app, confirm, and switch back, the page reloads and the 2FA didn't get through. Tickets and such are the only reason I have still chrome installed.
This is Android aggressively killing apps, not Firefox.
Possibly, but previously I've been able to load a site, open a media-rich page in a new tab, then close that tab to go back to the original page.
On a newer build of FF for Android, that first page is re-loaded from the internet.
Hmm, I'm not experiencing that. Could Android (well, the flavour used by your phone) be killing background apps too aggressively or something like that?
Edit: could also be a RAM thing. I have 12GB.
I'm not experiencing that issue either and I have half the amount of RAM that you do. I've noticed an unnecessary autorefresh only after closing out of the browser for a long time, never in the middle of switching between apps. But, that does sound like annoying behavior.
load more comments
(3 replies)
This annoyed me too. I use Firefox Nightly with accessibility.blockautorefresh set in about:config, and it helps.
load more comments
(11 replies)
why it was restricted in the first place?
Because there were enough incompatibilities to make it a hassle. But when they were sorting out the Web Manifest v3, they designed it with desktop and mobile in mind, so new extensions won't have problems.
It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest.
I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Maybe they couldn't guarantee that the mobile version could run well with all of them? That's what I've always assumed.
Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could've just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn't worth the headache.
If you use Beta or Nightly, you can turn on dev tools and use a custom addon list from a collection in your user account. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extension-support-in-firefox-for-android-nightly/
load more comments
(2 replies)
For those who don't know yet: Firefox Nightly for Android let you install any extension you desire.
You just need to create a custom collection on the web site and link your ID in nightly.
load more comments
(11 replies)
My goodness that's awesome. I never understood why they locked it down in the first place about a year ago. What changed?
load more comments
(1 replies)
great, now waiting for them to finally fix the supremely janky tab behavior.
Nice. What I need now is the ability to group tabs together
Have you tried sidebery? When I found tree layout for tabs to be a thing I haven't looked back.
Thank you! I am going to install it right now on my desktop PC. I was referring to the android version btw 😂
load more comments
(1 replies)
Installed firefox yesterday. Nothing really changed or improved. Uninstalled firefox.
It's 3 clicks to install AdBlock on Firefox mobile and that alone instantly makes it superior to Chrome.
Ublock origin is better I believe.
Ublock origin is actually #1 on top of the list and the one I have installed, I was using "adblock" as a generic term.
As far as I can tell, chrome mobile does not support ublock origin like firefox mobile does.
What is the main reason you (presumably) use Chrome over Firefox? People here might be able to help you solve the problem.
load more comments
(14 replies)
Literally was just telling my partner how much better browsing is since switching to Firefox on android. The ability to install extensions period is a huge upgrade, but also there are several available that are fantastic and not features available on chrome. Not sure what you mean about needing extensions to match chrome features. In fact, none of the extensions I've installed are features present in chrome. Plus I can block ads and trackers, activate dark mode everywhere, and use YouTube for audio with my screen off. I am kicking myself for being lazy. On top of giving Google personal data for no reason, I've had a worse browsing experience for years.
load more comments
(5 replies)
It's funny how some people are willing to use weird android mods that can't run half of the apps to protect their privacy while others can't even wait 0.01s longer for a page to load.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Yesssss
It's about damn time
This is great.
view more: next ›