this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
103 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
68 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PICKERINGTON, Ohio (April 26, 2024) — In the wake of the most recent tragedy involving a fatal collision between a Tesla vehicle in autopilot mode and a motorcyclist in Washington state, the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) once again urges the Department of Transportation (DOT) to strengthen Automated Driving System (ADS) regulations.

“Many autonomous vehicles on the road today have not been proven to detect all other road users in all situations before they have been allowed to be used on the road,” Dingman added. “Motorcyclists should not be used as guinea pigs for autonomous vehicle manufacturers. The continued allowance of untested autonomous vehicles on our nation’s roadways is unacceptable. The time for action is now!”

To add to that, you should see how these "accident avoidance systems" plow through dummies during tests. You'd have to have been paid off to allow these vehicles on public roads!

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Calling their driver assistance program autopilot would have resulted in Tesla being sued into the ground for false advertising long ago if we lived in a fair system.

I think the progress we've made on driverless vehicles is pretty amazing and I really want to live in a world where they work - but we're not there yet and some idiots are under the impression we are.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, to any engineer it's no secret why the system has been in "beta" for almost a decade. It's because there is no way they can probe it works 100% of the time

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We already have fully driverless cars. They're called trains

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Trains have drivers. They’re called locomotive engineers.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Then what do we call the people who design the locomotives?

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 3 points 4 months ago

Such as the driver of the latest victim. He was looking at his phone when he/his car hit and killed someone.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the progress we’ve made on driverless vehicles is pretty amazing and I really want to live in a world where they work - but we’re not there yet and some idiots are under the impression we are.

Who is the "we" you mentioned three times ?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Society at large.

[–] LovesTha@floss.social 1 points 4 months ago

@xmunk @Showroom7561 the impression we are there already is only marginally more dangerous than thinking it is only 5~10 years off. Full self driving is still very hard.

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

Please just do automated trams.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't give a fuck if crash avoidance systems plow through test dummies sometimes. The times it doesn't matter.

Autopilot is an entirely different topic, but crash avoidance is worth it.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t give a fuck if crash avoidance systems plow through test dummies sometimes. The times it doesn’t matter.

Would you be OK with human drivers plowing into pedestrians without any reason whatsoever, just because other people don't the other 99% of the time?

These advanced systems should never fail, especially not in test scenarios that couldn't be easier for them to pass. Some of these vehicles literally fail to even slow down while hitting the test dummies!

Add them into a random adventure that is the real world, and I wouldn't trust them unless they don't kill people like it was a lottery draw.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Crash avoidance systems only engage when the driver has already abdicated control. Whatever's in front of the car is already doomed without crash avoidance at that point.

And no ridiculous wall of text changes any of those facts.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Here's a video report from last week, showing how crash avoidance works, and that auto break simply fails to work in some vehicles. And yes, the feature does work in other vehicles, as they should in such easy scenarios.

The problem is, you have cars marketed and sold as having these features that simply do not work. And it's clear that drivers who own vehicles with all these magical features get lulled into believing they don't have to pay attention 100% of the time and at a moment's notice.

Nobody on public roads should be OK with this.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's great but the computer stepping in with the human failed hurts nothing and can only improve the situation