Does Firefox break for people? I've used it solidly for years without a reinstall.
this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
61 points (80.8% liked)
4chan
4232 readers
3 users here now
Greentexts, memes, everything 4chan.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Same here, but I imagine there are vastly different usage pattens. Maybe Firefox doesn't support some that well. I couldn't use any other browser though.
Same here (Windows, Android and Linux)
I've used both the normal and nightly builds and have never had an issue beyond nightly just crashing and closing like twice years ago and I was still able to open it with all my tabs intact.
Idk how you use Firefox wrong but anon here is doing it. Got mine loaded with add-ons n shit never had an issue in years. Imagine actually using brave.
The problem is chromium dominance (edge and chrome mostly) as it makes other browsers vulnerable to the noncompetitive web standard changes that google likes.
Imagine still using Brave in current year.
Brendan Eich is a piece of shit
I don't know what they mean about firefox breaking, unless they are on the nightly stream. I don't recommend being on nightlies if stability is important to you.
I have been using Nightly on Android and Windows for years now and even that doesn't break. I probably had minor bugs from time to time but so few I don't even remember any specifically. But I do agree with you of course. On my work laptop I also use stable, just in case.
Same, I've had it crash like twice years ago and didn't even lose my tabs. Everything was fine.
Anon works in Brave's marketing department
Anon's baiting the audience of browsers I've not even heard of. I've googled SigmaOS and still unsure wtf is that, some coupling of productivity app and a browser that paints itself as the whole OS for all working needs, with one window\tab and a $10 subscription, exclusive to Macs, and is unironically called Sigma? I mean, it sounds even more niche than our favorite Firefox forks, folks. I'd not bite, but it was a pretty interesting dive. Thanks, anon.
Didn't get Firefox problem, complete refresh? Like close it and opening it again?
I wouldn't use Brave if you paid me, but yes, browsers are all pretty shitty RN.
Curious, what are the issues with Brave?
https://www.kevinmuldoon.com/do-not-use-brave-browser/
Not to even mention shoving crypto in there for no good reason, spiking worldwide energy usage with its mere existence.
Thanks for that vid, had some great perspective!
This article is FUD for the most part:
- replacing ads - nope, by default you don't see any replacement ads, rather you see the least amount of ads on any chromium based option out there (e.g. Brave is the only browser I've found that still blocks the vast majority of ads on YouTube videos). You need to opt in to see replacement ads
- affilate links - yeah, that was some bs that happened 4 years ago, they were called out on it, and they promptly removed them, and these things have never appeared again.
Regarding the crypto stuff - that is by default off, again you need to opt in to it. Now, there is basic usage stats that are sent back to Brave that are on by default, but these can be turned off easily in the settings.
If there is any real objection that can be made to Brave it's that the CEO has contributed cash to anti-gay-marriage campaigns in the past (which is why he has fired from Mozilla) and that he has expressed some reactionary political views in social media. I can understand people boycotting Brave for that.
Meanwhile, Brave is the only browser I've found that completely passes the EFF's test at coveryoutracks.eff.org - and in other pricacy and security audits it performs always at "best in class" levels.
Oh, well written. I should update my research
I haven't had any issues with Librewolf breaking
No one has mentioned Vivaldi yet. I haven't found it slow in the years I've used it. It does hog memory with the amount of tabs I open, but no more than any other browser I've used. Fortunately it has inactive tab suspenders as an option to help with my bad habits (natively now, and through chrome extensions before that). Also, it is undoubtedly the most visually customizable browser I know, so it being ugly is really you making the sandwich.
If this was just bait, I guess it got me. If not, anon could try Tor if they value privacy, or maybe something minimalist if they really care about performance.
Tor is already technically mentioned in anon's post, as a fork of firefox, technically.
Oh, today I learned!
Literally my only gripe with Firefox is that the mobile version on Android frequently plays html5 Videos very choppy and you have to reload the page to get normal fps. Apart from that it's the obvious, good choice.
Why nobody mentions ungoogled-chromium?
Well in many respects, no Chromium based browser can be ungoogled, it's literally Google's project.
I also struggle with browsers :\ It seems like every one is just a different shade of dogshit but Firefox is still my daily driver and I have few issues with it so idk what the guy in image is on about. Brave is overrated
Vivaldi has some closed source components to it, so that makes it a "pass" for a lot of us that are more privacy focused. But in performance and features Vivaldi is certainly a good chromium based browser - it's just not one I choose for myself.
WebKit is cross platform, The only reason those browsers are platform-locked is because the devs wanted them to be.
Ok so I have been using Waterfox and Brave for some time, switching between them to decide which I like more.
On one hand, I am a little worried about all the stuff people bring out about Brave and really want to switch to WF. But on the other hand, WF seems really slow compared to brave and PiP just lags my whole system sometimes, even if I turn HW acceleration for video rendering, somehow WF (and all FF forks I have tried) hogs my GPU and my whole OS stutters here nad there when playing PiP videos.
I am on linux, have relatively beefy PC with 64gb ram, RTX 3060 and few years old CPU. Has anyone faced this issue and fixed it somehow or is the video rendering in FF just that bad?