this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)

tails: A Place for Mastodon Posts

355 readers
1 users here now

A virtual community

Posts from Mastodon users, featured natively in a community, so you can view them without the need for them to be re-hosted or screenshoted, and reply to the original author and Mastodon respondents if you wish.

Has so far included content from Warsandpeas, Mr. Lovenstein, SMBC, Loading Artist, Low Quality Facts, nixCraft, ElleGray, and other interesting or provocative stuff I've random'd across on Mastodon.


Supported:
Comments & Upvotes
Unsupported:
Posts, Downvotes, & PD's Automod

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Image description: An electric car, 1912


(Originally published on toot.wales: 2024-03-14) - Click the Fedi-Link to visit.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Apparently it was quite the battle between electric and gas back then. Hybrids even came out. But the design of the gas motor improved and batteries were shit back then, so gas won.

*And the energy density of gasoline is unreal.

[–] Haagel@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The energy density of gasoline is great, but the ratio of joules to kinetic energy in anything but a tiny car is piss poor compared with modern battery electric vehicles. I’ve read that you get something like 13% of the gasoline’s potential energy transformed into force on the tires. This varies according to the quality of the vehicle, of course.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Not really the metric that mattered at the time. It was energy, or distance you could drive, per kg and per liter. Gasoline is dense.