this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
307 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19229 readers
2862 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 54 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yeah no shit. Every major power is trying to influence their rivals' elections, it's the most cost effective way to try and destabilize a country like the U.S. or China. What's more interesting is which side they're interfering for. We know the Republicans are firmly in Moscow's pocket, we know that Trump considers China an enemy, but that doesn't necessarily mean China wants a Democrat either. It could be that the geopolitical gains China made during Trump's administration outweighed all the trade war tariff nonsense, and they want the idiot to drag us further backwards so they can expand their hegemony.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

China's funneled almost as much money into Donnie's pockets as Russia. He's also not keen on maintaining alliances with Japan and South Korea. It's an easy choice for them.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 13 points 7 months ago

I think this might be the answer. An isolationist US won't mind an attack on Taiwan. Very clever.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This article basically just repeats my speculation in significantly more detail. Sure Trump said the words "I love China," but the man is a pathological liar who started a trade war with China after saying that and plans to start another one if elected. In his own special way, he even recognizes that the Chinese hegemony is slowly replacing the American one with his rambling on the yuan. They're certainly not friends, and the article's conclusion just indicates that the author thinks Beijing wants a useful idiot.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Trump’s anti-China stance is largely performative, and mostly self-defeating; think domestic tariffs etc.

Sure, that may hurt China’s export potential to the US - but it’s a price the CCP is gambling would pay off in the long-term as Trump’s isolationist stance would weaken regional allies spheres of influence, and provide China the ability to step in and fill the vacuum (best case) or further invade territories they deem theirs (Taiwan, islands within the 9 dashes - worst case).

In situations like this, it’s very much better to side with the devil you know.

The CCP just hasn’t offered Trump a large enough quantity of money yet.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I think they're pro-delegitimizing. After that... I'm curious too.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's cute when the US accuses countries of interfering with elections like they're protecting their world record or something

[–] andrefsp@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Oh shit. Such a edgy comment buddy. Now tell me, what elections does China has for the US to be meddling wih?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

They f****** over Pakistan's elections just a few months ago, USA is the king of ruining functioning governments anywhere in the world.

CIA straight up admitted they failed to gain an operational foothold in China like they did everywhere else which is why they never have a solid grasp on what China's next move will be. Not to mention the CCP makes arrests like monthly on people they believe or accuse of having connections to the CIA.

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Proof read your shit bruv.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 7 months ago

I think the point is that the US wanders the world (apart from China), election-meddling and influencing and coup-ing, and then all of a sudden when it happens to us it's some kind of pearl clutching emergency and crime.

To be clear, I don't think we should be doing it to other countries, and I don't think they should be doing it to us. And I think the prospect of another Trump presidency would be so catastrophic for people the world over that it's worth resisting election interference on his behalf, even if you have no particular love for the US and its little adventures on the global stage. But certainly the US State Department getting upset that someone's influencing our democracy, even though we don't want them to, can be met with a certain amount of pure derisive laughter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But hasn’t seen anything wrong with Israel, hmmm

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago

They're still asking Israel to investigate themselves.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Show us then.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 6 points 7 months ago
[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

I'm sure the same government that uncritically swallows every lie Israel has pushed to further their genocide is exactly who we should trust to vet this intel

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago
[–] Lassielmr@mastodon.scot 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@mozz the hypocrisy is astounding. The USA has been interfering in elections for the year dot.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

He has to pay a price. Washington should embolden Turkish opposition leaders to be able to take on and defeat Erdogan.

Oh shit that was an inside thought, not a lay out to the press what we’re planning to do type thought.

Not by a coup, not by a coup, but by the electoral process.

Whew. Saved it. That was a close one.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Sounds awfully similar to "devote Imran Khan from PM and arrest his party, but uh don't kill him because that would be a coup"

[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

They only do this on days that end in y. Oh, and we already knew this. We're just here to let you know we've always been at war with Eastasia.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"The Asian autocrats are taking over!" - local autocrats possibly

load more comments
view more: next ›