this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
122 points (96.9% liked)

Nintendo

18438 readers
10 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On August 17, the beloved Western experience Red Dead Redemption and its horror companion Undead Nightmare arrive together for the first time on the Nintendo Switch and modern PlayStation systems.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kingshrubb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can the switch even handle the graphics? I guess somehow It can.

[–] kbity@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The undocked Switch is in the same ballpark for raw power as the 360 and PS3, so as long as they've managed to sufficiently unfuck the game's nightmare spaghetti code, should be just fine.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

This is Rockstar to be fair

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Switch is faster than a PS3/360, which the original game ran on.

To summarize, unoptimized PS3 < 360 < optimized PS3 < WiiU (slightly slower cpu then previous, faster GPU) < Switch in terms of devices with a roughly similar performamce level.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Switch has pretty underwhelming specs but this is a PS2 game isn't it?

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

360/PS3. Switch will struggle for sure. It’ll probably be 30fps @720p with either slightly lower res or unstable framerate.

[–] Schaedelbach@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Never played this one, only the second. I especially liked the slow and deliberate style and pacing of RDR 2, something a lot of people found off putting. Is this game similar? I guess my question is: If I liked the gameplay of the second game will I enjoy the first?

[–] lamebox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both are equally stellar. 1 plays like a typical spaghetti western while 2 plays like a western drama of sorts, so you’ll find the tone a bit off-putting at first and the story doesn’t carry a lot of the heft that 2 did. Mechanics such as Honor play almost no role in the story so it’s a more linear experience, too.

When it comes to gameplay, you’ll most definitely enjoy 1. I’d say the first game plays a bit better; the controls are more streamlined, and I found myself making a lot of mistakes when it came to 2’s weird interaction menus and such, so it’s a nice change of pace. Aspects such as hunting and side stories are naturally not as fleshed out, but that’s up to personal preference. They’re still pretty good and engaging.

If you ever wanted to pick up RDR1, now’s a great time. We long heard stories of how hellish the development of the game was, so it being available on modern systems is a great achievement. We have yet to see how it would perform on the Switch however.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I would say that the gameplay is a more simplified version of red dead 2. The base mechanics are mostly the same but red dead 2 adds more depth. In some ways I prefer the gameplay in red dead 1 as it’s simple to understand health, stamina, and dead eye work without having to bother with “cores” (there are no cores in red dead 1)

Eating and medicine is simply for restoring health, deadeye is refilled by getting head shots. No gun maintenance or inventory management needed in the first game.

The story is a bit more focused in the first game as well instead of strung out into chapters.

[–] Synthaxx@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The funny thing is that chronologically RDR 1 is set after RDR 2.

That being said, you'll probably enjoy this one too.

[–] CaptFeather@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's coming to Switch, but not PC? God, fuck rockstar.

[–] gravitasium@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Silver lining is we can play it with cemu!

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

RDR1 has already been playable on Xenia for quite some time. (And the emulator your thinking of is Yuzu/Ryujinx, Cemu is a wiiu emulator)

Oh man... Choosing games is really becoming tough lately! Busy with TOTK after I am done I plan on buying Hogwarts Legacy assuming it still launches on time. Also want to play Witcher 3 - been toying with this in my mind for some time now. Oh well maybe I'll just buy all three...

[–] utnapishtim@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the launch price be 60 euro and after two years it will be 49,99.

[–] _finger_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Instant buy, been waiting to revisit this game. Surprised it even runs in Switch

[–] dessel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nice. I love to see so many 360/PS3 era games come to switch. Hope for Oblivion or FO3 to get released

[–] Narann@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

While I'm excited, I will definitely wait for reviews. Rockstar is not the most trusted company.