this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
265 points (95.8% liked)

Comics

5914 readers
14 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/4326691

It is that easy /j

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Did people at some point really believe that taking out all our trash out of sight and tossing them somewhere else would "save the planet"?

[–] Scrommis@lemmy.zip 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It does help in a pretty big way - every piece of trash in landfill is one less in the ocean.

Plus landfills will be literal goldmines in 50 years as we development advanced recycling technologies and robots.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

On the other hand, landfills leak contaminants to the soil and water, produce a lot of methane, and probably other things too. I'd also argue that they give a illusion of a problem solved, and lead people and companies into not wanting to reduce trash production.

[–] odium@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's also the fact that a lot of your trash doesn't go to landfills, but instead gets shipped to developing countries where they often dump it into Wall-E style open air trash mountains.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago

When I was a kid, it was "Reduce, Re-use, Recycle". The order was quite intentional.

Nobody ever talks about the first two anymore. Probably because they are wildly anti-consumption and thus bad for business.

I went on vacation recently. Visited Houston, Austin, and Dallas by EV. I was, and still am, amazed that the giant gas stations along the highway (Buc-ees, Road Ranger) are still using Styrofoam cups at the soda fountain. I can't believe those are even still being made.

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Found the capitalist.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

Much like recycling, these environmental campaigns are just green washing so that the companies, specific the petroleum companies, that are actually destroying the earth are never threatened. Even as the earth is destroyed and society breaks down, their last quarter will still be profitable.

[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

While I wouldn't argue it saves the planet, sequestering garbage in far off, centralized, contained locations is a little better for public health than simply tossing it in the streets like we used to do. Cholera outbreaks happened on the regular before organized waste collection became a thing.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 6 months ago

That for sure. I was referring to the people who think that just because the collected trash isn't a problem for them in a direct way anymore, it's all solved.