this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
2329 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9788 readers
730 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xendarq@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I feel like there's some hidden message in here about gun control, but gosh darn it I just can't see it over the hood of my F150.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are a few minibuses that my local transit provider operates for suburban routes, the kind that's a bus cabin bolted to a modified Ford truck body or van. Something I noticed riding those buses is that the operator sits lower and has a smaller engine compartment obstructing their view than a lot of five-seater SUVs.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Should be required by law that all new cars have Pedestrian crash avoidance mitigation (PCAM) systems. In the same way that seatbelts and rear cameras are required. Would be surprised if it’s nit required by 2030.

[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Don't give any Republicans any ideas. They might consider this seriously.

[–] boem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] wilberfan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

"...make up 80% of new car sales in the U.S." #yikes

They’ll cover them in corporate “crash detection” cameras for which you need to pay a monthly subscription and they take all the data and sell it to cops anyway. It’s a win-win-win for capitalism!

[–] Neato@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Trucks are commercial vehicles. You need them for towing, hauling and other construction related activities. License, permit and tax them as such. If you have a huge boat or RV you need to tow, get and pay for a permit. Have the taxes be based on mileage so the more they're used, the more expensive it is. We invented weigh stations to make trucks compensate for the additional strain they put on roads. Same for these trucks. That'll help prevent them from being daily drivers.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SighBapanada@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

This comic was made by a pathetic, jealous shortwalker

I seem to recall seeing a Hummer H2 recently and being astounded that it looked not only "normal", but even a bit on the small side.

[–] jannis@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Colin Furze had the solution for cyclists three years ago: https://youtu.be/vZFDNR9V5Nc

[–] ScureScar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I would appreciate an illustration with kids standing , not sitting

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›