this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
77 points (98.7% liked)

Interesting Shares

816 readers
40 users here now

Companion community of !globalnews@lemmy.zip to share interesting articles, projects and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.

Icon attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It was billed as a futuristic, glass-walled city, but was only ever realised in the digital sphere – where it should remain

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mesophar@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It was billed as a futuristic, glass-walled city, but was only ever realised in the digital sphere – where it should remain

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It was billed as a futuristic, glass-walled city, but was only ever realised in the digital sphere – where it should remain

It was billed as a futuristic, glass-walled city, but was only ever realised in the digital sphere – where it should remain

[–] kabi@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

:It was billed as a futuristic, glass-walled city, but was only ever realised in the digital sphere – where it should remain

[–] lemmy_at_em@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

SPOILER WARNING!!! It was billed as a futuristic, glass-walled city, but was only ever realised in the digital sphere – where it should remain.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Wasn't there going to be multiple underground subway lines to transport people and goods across the length of it?

Be hardly worth it for a 1.5 mile run. Maybe they'll switch to pedicabs.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago

noooo, really? surely no one could have ever predicted this outcome!