Java

1365 readers

1 users here now

For discussing Java, the JVM, languages that run on the JVM, and other related technologies.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

JackbyDev@programming.dev

thtroyer@programming.dev

[Question] Why does Auth0 allow for direct usage of social logins, but with Keycloak I have to register my app at each Identity Provider first? (lemm.ee)

submitted 6 months ago by abbadon420@lemm.ee to c/java@programming.dev

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://lemm.ee/post/29785400

So I'm making a project in SpringBoot with Oauth security.

If I use Auth0 as my Authorization Server, I can register an application there and just say that I want user to be able to login with Google an Facebook. That's all it takes.

If I use Keycloak as my Authorization Server, I can also have users choose Google or Facebook as there prefered login, but in order to provide that, I have to register my app with Google and Facebook first.

So how come it's so easy with Auth0 and a little less easy with Keycloak? Is it a contract thing, does Auth0 have contracts with all these providers or something?

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

Auth0 has "development keys" for you to test integration with social logins. For production environment, you should still use your own keys.