this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
148 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In an exclusive interview, the president of Ukraine talks about his outreach to Trump, stalled Ukraine aid and Russia’s growing influence in the U.S.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine warned in an interview that Russian influence had pierced the American political system and rejected the idea, backed by allies of Donald Trump, that Ukraine could swiftly end the war just by making massive territorial concessions.

But Zelenskyy said Tuesday that he had privately urged Trump through intermediaries to travel to Ukraine and that Trump had expressed interest but had not yet committed to making a trip. Zelenskyy said he was open to hearing Trump’s proposals for the war, while making clear he was highly skeptical.

“If the deal is that we just give up our territories, and that’s the idea behind it, then it’s a very primitive idea,” Zelenskyy said in an interview with Axel Springer media outlets. POLITICO is owned by Axel Springer.

Zelenskyy continued: “I need very strong arguments. I don’t need a fantastic idea, I need a real idea, because people’s lives are at stake.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Perfectly fitting ad from the Politico article

[–] MicroWave@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Wow the ads. I assumed everyone was already using some sort of ad blocker.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They probably should, ads are super annoying.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 13 points 7 months ago

And malicious, they spy on you, infect you with malware, and amount to about half of web traffic, causing insane emissions, 20 times that of crypto.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Tucker Carlson is not strictly speaking considered an ad, although he probably should

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's the in-app browser. Otherwise I do.

[–] Kaliax@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

You can switch it to default to your browser (hopefully with ad blocking) of choice.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago

These are the exact kind of targeted ads I see when I disable my adblock. I'm a white male in rural Kentucky so I guess advertisers assume I watch Tucker Carlson and buy trucks (as if I could even afford one).

It's at least an assurance that I've been successful at protecting my privacy enough that advertisers don't know specifics beyond my surface-level demographics.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

In other news, the sky is blue.

This fact is obvious to anyone with basic critical thinking skills. The problem is that there's a huge portion of the US population that's been lied to by a group of corporate media as a reaction to the public backlash over Watergate that resulted in Nixon's resignation. A portion of the media has been utilizing Amygdala Hijacking to force emotional reactions via fear responses to misinformation for 40+ years. People are scared about threats that doesn't actually exist and are actively working against their own self-interest due to those non-existent threats, regardless of any counter proof. They weren't reasoned into being fearful of the thing, so reason can't get them back out of it.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I really hope Trump goes and gets bombed by a Russian drone or something