UK Politics

3103 readers

286 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

142

Rishi Sunak says he went without 'lots of things' including Sky TV as a child (youtu.be)

submitted 5 months ago by frankPodmore@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

HOW IS HE SO BAD AT THIS?

He should've said, 'Look, I was very fortunate growing up, there's no point denying that. What I want is for every child to have the opportunities I had, that's why our policy is to blah, blah first-time buyers blah tax, etc., unlike Labour who want blah VAT on private schools, blah'.

Instead, he gets immediately rattled and starts gibbering at the first follow-up question. He is just the worst.

By the way, this is the interview he thought was so important he had to run away from Normandy to do it. Apparently, it wasn't important enough for him to do any prep.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] anytimesoon 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, if those were my options, I certainly wouldn't opt for a life of politics

[–] echodot 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Then why doesn't he just resign? Why is he throwing the election intentionally.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Because only plebs give up power! A true aristocrat squanders all options to leave as little as possible behind.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago

I'm beginning to wonder if he's trying to throw it intentionally, and as badly as possible, so that he vindictively destroys the careers of all the MPs who have done nothing but plot to stab him in the back since the moment he became leader. There was a rather telling moment (yesterday I think) when he listed previous home secretaries but pointedly skipped Nutella Braverman. Sunak is certainly tetchy enough to go "fine, I'm going down and I'm taking you all with me!"

[–] anytimesoon 2 points 5 months ago

You'll have to ask him. I can only answer for myself. Happy to do an impromptu AMA on what I would do if I were Sunak

On that note, I would definitely resign today.