this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
327 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

59652 readers
5055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
327
What is Cara, the Instagram alternative that gained 600k users in a week? (www.creativebloq.com)
submitted 5 months ago by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Key points:

  • Cara's Rapid Growth: The app gained 600,000 users in a week

  • Artists Leaving Instagram: The controversy around Instagram using images to train AI led many artists to seek an alternative

  • Cara's Features: The app is designed specifically for artists and offers a 'Portfolio' feature. Users can tag fields, mediums, project types, categories, and software used to create their work

  • While Cara has grown quickly, it is still tiny compared to Instagram's massive user base of two billion.

  • Glaze Integration: Cara is working on integrating Glaze directly in the app to provide users with an easy way to protect their work from be used by any AI

more about: https://blog.cara.app/blog/cara-glaze-about

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't work like that. The monkey selfie case did not set any kind of precedence. Animals cannot own property, including copyrights.

For a work to be under copyright in the US, it has to be an "original work of authorship" and contain "a modicum of creativity". Some countries allow broader copyrights. Photographs that are accidentally triggered are public domain. CCTV footage is a gray area. Setting up a camera and luring animals into triggering it, might produce copyrighted images. A court would have to decide if the individual circumstances constitute authorship and a modicum of creativity. An animal snagging a camera and triggering it certainly doesn't. The monkey selfie case did nothing to advance the law.

A public domain image is just that. Attempting to assert ownership over one is either an error or fraud. I don't know what the US rules are when a rights-owner can't be found. I doubt that you can just become the default owner of some property just by writing something on a website.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The monkey selfie case did not set any kind of precedence.

literally next sentence.

Animals cannot own property, including copyrights.

This sounds like a precedent...

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Animals never could own property. PETA sued to get the monkey recognized as author and thus copyright-holder of the selfie. Or, more likely, to generate publicity as that was obviously never going to happen.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Correct. Which the court set a precedent for during that court case.

You claimed that no precedent was set. That's incorrect.