this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
107 points (95.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43396 readers
1465 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To not know would be like working in a company and not knowing your bases of operation, or like being a lawyer without having been to law school, so the assertions inspire either inexperience or skepticism. The actual social work institution (not just "working for society") has its management divided across the US into subregions that typically encompass a few states, and they encompass your jurisdiction. If you were a CPS agent (which is a social services subunit), for example, the absolute limit in which one could relocate children without needing to consult another level of power would be the edge of a district. Each district also varies in their expression of authority, and thus experiences with people are different in each, but generally this institution known for addressing issues of abuse and handling insurance changes is corrupt in America as well as nations unfortunate enough to have modeled their equivalent after the American system, the CPS in particular has thousands of examples of footage of them breaking into homes to take children who haven't even experienced abuse. If you consider yourself a social worker, I'd seriously suggest you look into who you're working for.
Are you a troll? There's not a shred of reality in anything you just wrote. The federal government has no role whatsoever in any CPS function, it's entirely a state-based system. This is also just completely made up:
The social work profession doesn't have a singular "management," there are state licensing boards the same way there are for doctors and nurses. Licensed social workers work for literally thousands of different agencies and there are no "sub regions that typically encompass a few states." Even better, almost none of the CPS caseworkers in my state are social workers. Social work has basically nothing to do with CPS. Where did you learn any of this?! Try to learn it again
I never said anything about the federal government, but the districts do exist as described. The CPS not being connected to the realm of social services is the most misguided claim there. Doubt intensifies
Do you have something against the usage of the DSS site of a local area to use as an example of one which proves my point about the CPS being one with social services? You are not using the term in the institutional sense if it's not specific to human resources, though I concede about one of the other parts, I mixed two of the maps up despite the same idea applying (I forgot the US district map and the state one were distinct). It is more or less similar to what I was saying.
I have something against someone who has something against someone who says it's a nightmare (aside from all the other things I've given to back myself up already, not to mention being anecdotal to complain I'm merely being anecdotal when I'm not), it's called loads upon loads of distributed stories and footage by people from all across the nation. What it's like to work in an organization doesn't take away from the hardship of dealing with those who do that work, the latter is the very reason I turned down doing the work. It could use some reforming, no matter what positives can be made of it.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
footage
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Thanks, Pipey.
Even though I mentioned there's a more "official" sense of the word at play?
In no non-broad definition is police going to be on there. I already clarified myself, everything else is just trying to ignore that, so no.
I'll put it this way, when your one and only business card says "social worker" on it, that's how you know. No one who is into insurance is going to say "here, this is my one card, call me" and it has an extension of the local court's phone number on it.
You already said that, to no change in effect. It is easily a straight enough answer if you have a card, or do you?
Alright. I would say the best one is that they're like diplomats, except instead of being international, they're top-down.
You asked, I answered, and nobody is making that up, unless you're not as you claim.
"Social services are like diplomats, except instead of being international, they're top-down" is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. You absolutely made that up.
How so?