this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
15 points (68.3% liked)

movies

1538 readers
273 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Link to the modlog: https://reddthat.com/modlog/11298

Link to the community: !movies@lemmy.world

Edit: for context, I first sent a DM to the single mod asking them if we could consider merging communities (basically my comment below). They ignored me but opened the thread.

My comment

Should we maybe consider merging this one with !movies@lemm.ee ? We have regular pinned posts and movie-specific discussion threads over there, and that community has been more active than this one lately, be it weekly or monthly (1.54k vs 1.32k and 2.92k vs 2.51k). The moderation team has several people, including movie enthusiasts who post there regularly. We had our first AMA a while ago a few weeks ago: https://lemm.ee/post/31335226 And if people ask why we wanted to have a community on another instance than Lemmy.world, the large majority of active communities are already on LW (https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active), it seems better to spread communities a bit.

Reason for removal

Not currently considering this action Maybe in the future.

I guess I'm just a bit sad that they removed the comment altogether instead of letting it there and considering a discussion.

I've heard several times that Lemmy should consolidate communities (like what happened with !mapporn@lemmy.world and !map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz recently), but I guess it's easier said than done.

In the meantime, congrats for making this community the most active one!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I get you don't think you were engaging in self-promotion by publicly talking up your community within their community, but you actually were, and it's explicitly against their rules. And yes, as a mod of this community, it is your community, as it is for anyone involved in this community who has an interest in driving traffic to it

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It'd be better if you accepted you broke that community's rules and the mod was justified in removing your comment rather than complaining about it and putting them on blast so publicly

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Hmmm. I feel like you may be a bit harsh here. I agree that the mod is free to do what they want, and generally don’t think community diversity is bad (though I lean toward some form of consolidation around this kind of community, or at least better organisation).

But for a nascent and small platform like the fediverse, talking about how we organise ourselves is almost always a fair topic of conversation IMO, for the simple reason that self-organisation is exactly what the fediverse is about, how it was made and how it will thrive.

And was it really against the rules? “Self promotion”? The suggestion was for a merger with a community where I’m not sure Blaze had anything personal to gain. So not promotion or for themselves?

I can’t shake the feeling that this is all very Reddit thinking, that makes more sense at their scale and with the more rabid behaviour and territorialism you’d get there. There, shutting down conversations like this makes sense as an immune response against potentially toxic bad faith actors. Plus, the number of users there is such that community building is easier.

But here? That might be an auto-immune disorder. People take ownership on the fediverse and have the opportunity to think about how things should be and even make that happen (beyond just starting a new community that is). Letting that all play out in conversations seems fundamental, and removing comments or banning users for trying to have organisational conversations may just be anti-fediverse as much as it might seem like reasonable community moderation, at least if we’re still doing things the Reddit way.

Ideally, perhaps, there’d be a good meta-community community for people to talk about these things without moderation concerns being triggered.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I appreciate your feedback, but disagree I'm the one being harsh. I think OP complaining about another community not being interested in merging with theirs and naming/shaming them is in poor taste.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. I can see the name and shame part, but my read, at least initially, was that it’s about having the discussion despite the other mod not allowing it (thus most of my comments).

Otherwise, I personally don’t mind surfacing mod “drama” here and there as it at least keeps that sort of thing in the open somewhat.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who are they trying to have a discussion with? The users of the community whose mod already told them they weren't interested? If I were that mod I'd've deleted their comment too

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who are they trying to have a discussion with?

I think it's fair to presume a decent amount of overlapping users, especially given how many use the All feed.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sure, so why not advocate in this community for combining the two, rather than targeting the users in that other community and complaining about the mod in that other community?

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I can't speak for Blaze or the other mods at all ... but this community (or at least Blaze and kinda myself) has already done the merging thing, and at that time it started with a conversation with the other mod. As this community has gone through that before, it makes sense that the idea is reasonable to (at least) the mods here, while the other community might be alien to the notion.

Beyond that, part of the motivation is to get more communities off of lemmy.world, which is an ideal felt pretty widely, if not universally, around lemmy/threadiverse ... so the suggestion was always to get them to merge with here (where, again, we've done the same before, forgoing this community to merge with another). So yea, talking about it here could have made sense (which is what this post is also about TBF, but also like I said, some neutral space for such discussions probably also makes sense), but I don't think talking about it there is a bad idea at all, rather I think it made sense, where, again, I just struggle with the notion that mods on lemmy are competitively trying to poach users from each other.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, well put.

some neutral space for such discussions probably also makes sense

!fedigrow@lemm.ee could be it

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Probably ... I'm personally not subbed to fedigrow and that would be the problem, that most aren't either (which is fine, many are happy to just use the platform).

Perhaps something more dedicated to community discovery and recommendation instead? Basically like the "new communities" community, but more general.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, yea ... I don't know if the mods there would be happy for it to become a general community discussion/promotion space ... but I've thought from the beginning that that was coming as a natural evolution anyway. There should at least be a sibling community for discussing communities (though perhaps on a more neutral instance given that lemmy-world have banned some communities AFAIU?)

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I posted there in the past following the !moviesandtv@lemm.ee drama, including links go the modlog and everything, the mods let the post untouched:

https://reddthat.com/post/12944886?scrollToComments=true

We can always give it a try and move if needed.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com -2 points 3 months ago

This community has been created to avoid overcentralization of Lemmy.world.

Also, if the LW community was actively managed I wouldn't mind (I regularly post to !avatar@lemmy.world, !lego@lemmy.world, !comicbooks@lemmy.world which are on LW), but they still don't have

  • discussion threads
  • weekly threads

Consolidation of communities is an issue that is regularly brought up on Lemmy, so that's what this whole suggestion was trying to address.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wanted to stop there but if you want to give it another go, sure.

First of all, there has been "self promotion" about this community on !movies@lemmy.world in the past:

I had a few discussions via DM with the main mod in the past, all went well as you can see above.

Also, he didn't add the reason of his removal as "self promotion", but as "Not currently considering this action". He didn't even mention breaking any rule.

putting them on blast so publicly

I would have rather preferred having discussed that over DMs, but he never replied to my first.

Also, aren't modlogs public for a reason, to keep moderators accountable for their decisions?

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your effort to conglomerate all communities under your banner is basically the antithesis of the federated model, and even if it was not considered self promotion, I can see clearly why it was considered overtly hostile and removed.

For somebody who cares deeply about the federation, its userbase, statistics and otherwise, you are actually replicating one of the major issues with reddit that federation was trying to solve. Stop trying to be a powermod in the name of defragmentation. It's just centralization of power.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

For somebody who cares deeply about the federation, its userbase, statistics and otherwise, you are actually replicating one of the major issues with reddit that federation was trying to solve. Stop trying to be a powermod in the name of defragmentation. It’s just centralization of power.

So we should just let LW moderators be powermods instead? Who centralizes power, a few mods in this community, or LW who conglomerate the very large majority of active communities under their banner? https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active

Edit: the new mod is also a mod of !gaming@lemmy.world, !unpopularopinion@lemmy.world, !news@lemmy.world, !politicalmemes@lemmy.world, and !iowa@lemmy.world: https://lemmy.world/u/JonsJava

But I guess I am the power mod?

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My brother in Christ, you are literally trying to power broker on federated social media.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com -1 points 3 months ago

Just pointing out when people centralize and abuse their power. As you said, we left Reddit for a reason.