this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
1825 points (96.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
1060 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    lol pay for someone. If it’s your code, you are that someone.

    [–] huginn@feddit.it 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Companies own the code you write.

    It's not your code if you're working for a corp - it's theirs.

    [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    If someone else is paying you, you can write sloppy code. Got it.

    [–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Psychopath

    Just because you don't own something doesn't mean you should trash it.

    First you insist that companies don't own the code then you say if you don't own it you don't have to care.

    God I hope I never work with an idiot like you.

    [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I don’t think I’m saying either of those things. I’m saying the opposite actually.

    You seem to be suggesting that even though you are responsible for writing code, the company should hire someone else to optimize it for you.

    [–] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Resources are just way cheaper than developers.

    It's a lot cheaper to have double the ram than it is to pay for someone to optimize your code.

    I don't see where you're reading that idea.

    It's a lot cheaper to double the ram ergo you do not have to pay someone to optimize your code.

    Where are you getting this bizarre inverse from?

    [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

    My point is, developers should be writing optimized code in the first place.