Asklemmy

43958 readers

1681 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Which adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 5 months ago by CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

152 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

A solid chunk of Philip K Dick's output worked better as movies/TV than as books.

There's definitely something there, but the books feel somewhat unfinished/unpolished. Which makes sense, his books weren't popular in English until after the release of Blade Runner, which coincided with his death. Maybe the popularity of the movie would've given him more time and resources to revise future works.

A Scanner Darkly is the only one where both the book and the movie felt about the same quality.