this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
2466 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3051 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

nuff said

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 188 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He bought the users. Elon knows that people are lazy and will not change websites.

[–] Anomandaris@kbin.social 197 points 1 year ago (2 children)

-50% ad revenue says otherwise

[–] Arakwar@kbin.social 107 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter could have 200% more users, if no one want to show them ads, then ad spots will be dirt cheap. Printing 5 millions of 1cent ads vs 1 million of 10cents ads is not the same. Both on income and expenses...

[–] 1nk@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This, so much this. I also find it rather coincidental that fb cam out with threads soon after the twitter implosion. Opportunistic feasting on a dead carcass perhaps?

[–] Neato@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Twitter has been on the outs since musk bought it. If Facebook was smart they'd have started right then.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads looks like they started development as soon as Musk bought twitter.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to Adam Mosseri, IG had been working on Threads in various forms since 2021. Apparently they struggled to make it a native part of IG, then started working on the stand-alone version in 2022. So if he is to be believed, Threads development predates Twitter’s sale to Musk.

[–] cyberian_khatru@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

my guess is that they were working on it in the background and when musk bought tw they started pouring way more resources into it and turned it into a standalone app

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Threads still doesn't have #hashtag searching IIRC. It's missing a huge number of features. It's clear that they only came out as early as they did because they saw an opportunity to eat Twitter's lunch.

They really needed a few more months of dev time.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Bluesky is the same way. There are a lot of features there that still need to be implemented.

I’m glad Masto at least has hashtags and video and gifs and editing. For me right now it has the best features and the best experience. I’m pretty happy with it.

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Indeed, it looks like they hurried the threads launch because Twitter was having outages.

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Still exciting to be on the ground floor, when every day out week could bring a new update or feature. Wonder how they'll improve over the next 3 months

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Considering development time, server setup, testing time, etc… They probably did. It probably took several months to develop, deploy, integrate with the rest of their systems, and test. And then it’s simply a matter of waiting on Musk to do something stupid before they announce the launch, so all the freshly spurned users are happy to switch.

[–] oselecto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To be fair I don't think that can be entirely prescribed to drop in user base; the internet ad market in general is absolutely tanking at the moment.

[–] wnose@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

"users" - more than 50% are likely to be bots, LOL

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Most people I know that use Twitter did leave it because they can no longer use the platform. They used it to promote their work and get new clients, which through a series of changes is basically impossible now.

[–] penguin@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads has like 100 million sign ups. It could replace Twitter.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That saw an overnight 50% drop in activity. People were kinda pissed to find out that Meta created them a Threads handle from their Facebook/Instagram and immediately deactivated their Threads accounts. I don't know what it means, but I like it

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is it possible to deactivate your account without downloading the app?

[–] Acat114@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have an account unless you activate it, but they do hold your Instagram handle if you were to sign up that would be your Threads handle. The 50% drop in activity is because the app is lame as hell, and once people saw it they were done. No chronological sorting option, not even an option to only see threads from the people you follow.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

not even an option to only see threads from the people you follow.

lol then what's the fucking point of following anyone