this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
1234 points (95.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12758 readers
3022 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant "destroy the planet" as in lifeless/only single celled organisms.

And you can kind of see humanity as "just another big asteroid impact". Nature will recover competeley over the next million years or so. That's what I meant with mass extinctions being kind of inconsequential for the planet as a whole on geological time scales.

Obviously mass extinctions are also bad besides their effect on human society, I just meant that that is mostly a spiritual one thats hard to measure, about lost potential and eradicating a species. As a thought experiment, is eradicating a disease, a form of life, inherently negative? Mosquitoes? Do you agree that it's a big achievement that we eradicated small pox? What if we eradicate all existing diseases?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mass extinctions are different. We should be aiming to never have any more mass extinctions ever.

[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I guess that was a bit of a strawman. Obviously mass extinctions are bad.