this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
22 points (73.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43417 readers
1441 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The saying is hard to translate to English:
They can't see the forest behind the tree - that they were stuck on looking at.
An other one:
They can't find the udder between the horns.
Can’t see the forest for the trees?
I believe this is Swedish ("ser inte skogen för alla träd").
An attempt at a alternative translation; "can't see the forest because of all the trees". Which means you're perceiving the wrong part of the situation, and thus missing out on the bigger picture.
It's also an English expression.
It doesn't ring the same, at least for me.
I like how you said it's hard to translate to English, but English has the same saying. The saying must have a common ancestor between our two languages! (Or maybe one is the common ancestor...)