this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
168 points (99.4% liked)

BecomeMe

805 readers
1 users here now

Social Experiment. Become Me. What I see, you see.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Apparently it's still going to be legal to possess them with a prescription, but can doctors in Louisiana write such a prescription?

about 0.3% of people who used mifepristone to end a pregnancy experienced a major complication, meaning they required hospitalization, surgery or a blood transfusion. Surgical abortions done in the first trimester of pregnancy, by comparison, resulted in major complications 0.16% of the time

These pills are more dangerous than a surgical abortion? That's not what I would have expected.

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

0.3% experienceing side effects is hardly "dangerous". That's an order of magnitude less frequent than peanut allergies.

This is not about looking after the best interest of anyone

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree; I'm just talking about relative risk.

[–] pezhore@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Keep in mind, side effects can be literally anything reported - headaches, stomach cramps, etc.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The quote says “major complications” and defines what that means. It’s not just side effects. It is definitely surprising that the rate of complications is so much higher for the pills. Still, I think that’s something a doctor should take into account when prescribing and not a valid reason to ban it.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

It says “major complication” that required hospitalization, not side effects.

[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

If pieces remain, they need a D&C, which would never be a complication with surgical abortion because that's the surgery.