this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

AusFinance

993 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Would you prefer to argue the semantics, or the actual point?

Someone intentionally, knowingly, drops their legal projections to increase their personal benefit. They stop acting as an individual legally, and start acting as a company. And then the consequences of that action happen.

[โ€“] Ilandar@aussie.zone 0 points 5 months ago

What is your "actual point"? You keep referring to companies and telling me I'm not allowed to discuss the impact on individuals, despite the article, my original comment and every comment I've made since being focused on individuals, but then start randomly discussing individuals yourself when it suits you.

This discussion has never been about whether individuals or companies are culpable for their actions. You are either not reading any of my replies or you are just straight up ignoring them because you find the concept of empathy too emotionally challenging to handle. You are increasingly sounding like someone who struggles with emotional self-regulation and copes by finding fault in those around them.