this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
125 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
494 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree that 1000hz is ridiculous, I have a 165hz monitor and can't tell the difference past 120 or so. But that's not really the point...this will never be a mainstream product but the technology may lead to useful advancements in the future

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That is the point, most people don't do research and see "ahh a bigger number, it must be better!". 1Khz refresh rate may be a niche thing now but in two years every company will be pushing something similar.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Let "bigger is better" people waste their money like they already do on other products. It makes things cheaper for the rest of us while opening up new avenues for display technology in the future.