this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
89 points (69.8% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Many voters believe, with good reason, that none of this would have happened without Biden’s assent. Biden has continued to speak of Israel’s attack on Palestinian civilians using the absurd language of “self-defense”. He has insulted Jewish Americans and the memory of the Holocaust by invoking them to justify the slaughter. And though his White House repeatedly leaks that he is “privately” dismayed by Israel’s conduct of the war, he has done little to stop the flow of US money and guns that support it.

Even after the US state department issued a vexed and mealy-mouthed report on Israel’s conduct, which nevertheless concluded that it was reasonable to assess that Israel was in violation of international humanitarian law, the Biden administration has continued to fund these violations. That state department report was published on 10 May. The Biden administration told Congress that it intends to move forward with a $1bn arms sale to Israel. “OK, [Israel] likely broke the law, but not enough to change policy,” is how one reporter summarized the administration’s judgment. “So, what is the point of the report? I mean, in the simplest terms, what’s the point?”

Meanwhile, Biden has expressed public disdain for the Americans – many of whom he needs to vote for him – who have taken to protest on behalf of Palestinian lives. Speaking with evident approval of the violent police crackdowns against anti-genocide student demonstrations, he said coolly: “Dissent must never lead to disorder.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There's no need to engage with an argument that makes no sense.

Biden's pro-Israel policy is the same policy we've had for 76 years.

Trump's policy is "Gaza is a cancer, wipe them out fast".

Those are your two choices. You do not have an alternative.

Choosing not to vote only helps Trump.
Voting 3rd party only helps Trump.

[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

US presidents have told Israel to cut the shit and stop or else multiple times in the past and Israel has listened. The same can and should be done here. Eisenhower did it, ford did it, Reagan did it, and h w bush did it.

Trying to voter shame people when they feel so strongly about this really isn't going to work or help you. I agree, Trump really should not be allowed to get into office, but at the same time you can't act as if these voters don't have a right to be angry. For these people, it goes further than just voting.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

They really haven't listened, and will continue not listening.

My favorite example was in the run up to the Iraq war. One of the excuses W. tried to float was that Iraq was in violation of 17 or 18 UN resolutions.

At the time, Israel was violating over 80 of them and it would have been more except for US veto power.

As long as the money keeps flowing, Israel doesn't give two shits.

[–] beardown@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those are your two choices. You do not have an alternative.

You think this is a persuasive statement?

If the choice is between genocide and more genocide then voters are right to denounce the United States as a whole

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not intended to be persuasive, it's a statement of fact.

Israel is going to do whatever they want to do regardless of what Biden says.

The difference is, Trump would openly ENCOURAGE such genocide. Further, he would bring the worst of those policies back home, illegally invading Mexico the same way Israel illegally invaded Lebanon.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-mexico-kill-teams-drug-cartels-1235016514/

[–] beardown@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Trump would openly ENCOURAGE such genocide.

And what is Biden doing by continuing to supply arms and funds to Israel? And by threatening the ICC and ICJ?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden is not telling Israel "Gaza is a cancer, clear it out fast."

Trump specifically said that.

[–] beardown@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So what?

Biden is arming and funding Israel and is protecting them from international agencies.

Which is far worse than verbal statements

Trump is a fascist. But he never committed a genocide. Biden has.

Which is so foolish, as it makes fascism in America significantly more likely to occur, to disastrous results

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden has not committed genocide, Bibi is. Biden believes, sincerely believes, that Israel is allowed to defend itself.

Bibi is misaporopriating that belief, and the money, and the weapons.

[–] beardown@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden believes, sincerely believes, that Israel is allowed to defend itself.

You have no reason to believe that because you do not know Biden, nor do you have the ability to see into his mind.

The power of AIPAC and the usefulness of having a middle eastern port to place our aircraft carriers in range of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Turkey is a more compelling reason than any argument regarding Biden on a personality level

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] beardown@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden has said it over and over again

I agree that he has said it. But why does that make it true?

Repetition of a statement does not create truth

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, but it's an exhibition of sincere belief.

[–] beardown@lemm.ee -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why?

Politicians lie more than any other profession, and they do it to shape public perception and achieve their political goals, not to express their deeply held personal beliefs.

There is no reason to think Biden is being truthful here, especially in the face of overwhelmingly evidence of Israel's genocide. It's his ineffective attempt to save face as he engages in genocide denial and serves as an accomplice to genocide