this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
60 points (94.1% liked)

Hardware

4941 readers
35 users here now

This is a community dedicated to the hardware aspect of technology, from PC parts, to gadgets, to servers, to industrial control equipment, to semiconductors.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You absolutely can tell the difference between 90Hz and 1kHz. Just draw a squiggly line! See this video for a rather dramatic demonstration:

Microsoft Research: High Performance Touch

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This is a demonstration of latency, not frame rate. Did you intend to link something different?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A 1000Hz display necessarily has a latency of 1ms between frames. For 100Hz, that’s 10ms.

But this is only the lower bound. You have to include all other sources of latency, such as software, input hardware, drivers, graphics card, etc.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ahhh, now I see the connection! It's the update interval. I had to chew on it for a minute but the math checks out.