this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
692 points (97.1% liked)

Greentext

4348 readers
1137 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The Space Shuttle Challenger has entered the chat.

Not sure anyone would sign off on sending potential dirty bombs into space.

A few years back people were floating the idea of sending up orbital solar farms that would collect power and beam it to the surface.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Not sure anyone would sign off on sending potential dirty bombs into space.

At least not anymore.... We did a successful test of a nuclear powered ramjet in the 60's with project Neptune. But I guess that was before people were afraid of dirty bombs welded into the shape of cruise missiles.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_A119

You probably know about it, but I thought I'd throw it into the mix.

tl, dr = the Air Force was planning on detonating an atom bomb on the moon because shit like that made sense in the Cold War.

[–] splatt9990@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There was also a plan to explode nuclear bombs on shorelines to create artificial harbors, and of course the infamous Project Orion, a manned interstellar spaceship powered by exploding hydrogen bombs. Doing unhinged shit with nukes was all the rage back then I guess

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

If you haven't seen it, "The Three Body Problem" is a good series with a lot of wild ideas.

They use the hydrogen bomb spaceship idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)