this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
182 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
1010 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, they had mayors and stuff, a VERY clear class division and were technically under the rule of Gondor after the Northern Kingdom fell but Gondor didn't really have the resources or urge to do any ruling over there. Once Aragorn was in they were essentially an autonomous zone under military protection in exchange for maintaining the local roads and bridges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ziggurter@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hmm. IMO it's kind of weird to assume all hobbits were ideologically identical. They clearly didn't establish a completely anarchist society for themselves, but there was also a lot of resistance to and outright ignoring of authority among them. They didn't really give a shit if they were technically under the rule of some empire, and at least some of them didn't seem to give a shit about what the Mayor had to say. I don't think we got much of an insight into their economic relations.

It's true the ones who went adventuring were—or turned into—some pretty gross bootlickers, though.