this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
182 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
1010 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, they had mayors and stuff, a VERY clear class division and were technically under the rule of Gondor after the Northern Kingdom fell but Gondor didn't really have the resources or urge to do any ruling over there. Once Aragorn was in they were essentially an autonomous zone under military protection in exchange for maintaining the local roads and bridges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm a little more sympathetic to the Hobbits. Here you had a stable kin-based society in a part of the world that nobody cared about until some Fed from a far off Western Superpower (that destroyed an entire continent and sunk another island nation under the sea, mind you) is meddling around.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

they're settler colonists. where are the original inhabitants of the shire? bit suspicious, eh?

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

The timeline says they were "allowed" to move there by original settler-colony of Arnor, which suggests displacement since Tolkien is a known Western sympathizer.