Privacy

32120 readers

419 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

108

Telegram CEO calls out rival Signal, claiming it has ties to US government (www.theregister.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Caravaggio@feddit.nl to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 89 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The CEO also claims that users' Signal messages have popped up in court cases or in the media, and implies that this has happened because the app's encryption isn't completely secure. However, Durov cites "important people I've spoken to" and doesn't mention any specific instance of this happening.

[...]

The Register could not find public reports of Signal messages leaking due to faulty encryption.

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Durov's entire criticism seems to be based on implications and have no actual evidence of any technical problems with Signal. He's basically just throwing shade at a competing business, which amounts to whining.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Funny how first association is "end-to-end encryption is broken" and not, you know, that whoever used the message got hold of one of the "ends".