this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)

technology

23289 readers
52 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The problem I think isn’t really that the tank is vulnerable to drones, but that you will never really make infantry not vulnerable to drones. Infantry protects the tanks from conventional AT methods, but if you use the drone to kill the infantry then a tank relatively is pretty much dead. Also I think they are going to replace the m2.

[–] TraumaDumpling@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

AFAIK infantry are usually much more resilient to artillery or aerial bombardment than tanks, since infantry can weasel into holes and micro-terrain features to use as cover, and could use certain materials to camouflage thermal signatures easier than tanks - worst case scenario they can dig tunnels, which tanks cannot (yet, most of the time). ground drones or drones that fly closer to the ground could find infantry easier perhaps but would have a harder time navigating more complicated terrain than the open sky.

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago

Drones have also limited the size of essentially everything since their wide implementation in Ukraine. The typical squad size prior to Ukraine was 12 and now infantry are having to move in groups of 2-4. That alone is a huge blow to what infantry can do.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago

Also I think they are going to replace the m2.

They've been trying to replace it since like the 60s, and the most recent attempt flopped about 10 years ago.