Technology

59204 readers

3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SGE, ChatGPT and the likes are the stupidest thing to come from AI (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by SamB@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This may be an unpopular opinnion.. Let me get this straight. We get big tech corporations to read the articles of the web and then summarize to me, the user the info I am looking for. Sounds cool, right? Yeah, except that why in the everloving duck would I trust Google, Microsoft, Apple or Meta to give me the correct info, unbiased and not curated? The past experiences all show that they will not do the right thing. So why is everyone so OK with what's going on? I just heard that Google may intend to remove sources. Great, so it's like trust me bro.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

LLM just autocomplete on steroid. If they say it more, they lie.

If you want uncensored info, run local model. But most do not care or even know. Just how most people are with tech.

[–] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Uncensored ais are the best. I can ask them all the immature sex questions I want and never get banned.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I mean, sure, as long as you're keeping the data locally. Otherwise, yikes.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 points 6 months ago

Which model are you using?

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

LLM just autocomplete on steroid.

Funny you should say this. I only have anecdotal evidence from me and a few friends, but the general consensus is that autocomplete and predictive text are much worse now than they used to be.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

because of ai stuff. For these kinds of things, they are perfectly happy to advertise unprecedented 99% accuracy rates, when in reality, non ai tools are held to much higher standard (mainly that they are expected to work). If the code I wrote had a consistent, perpetual 1% failure rate (even after fixing it, multiple times), I'd have been fired long ago.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

If anyone wants a great source on exactly how chat GPT is essentially autocomplete on steroids, Steven Wolfram did a great write-up. It's pretty technical. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work/