History

23083 readers

81 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

WhoaSlowDownMaurice@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

Question about the use of nukes in WW2 (hexbear.net)

submitted 6 months ago by nothx@hexbear.net to c/history@hexbear.net

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Was talking to a friend of mine about the use of nukes and I was told about how it was the quicker way to save more lives. I’ve always heard this argument but still always believed that it was an extreme response that could have been avoided.

Am I naive in my thoughts here? What is everyone else’s interpretation of the events leading up to and the decision made to drop both bombs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

I totally agree, and I even said to him that the major aspect that makes me think conventional would have been less deadly is nuclear fallout.